Who would win?

[FlyingJesus]

Assuming all non-humans lifeforms knew that they were meant to attack humans, the "animals" would win. There are plenty of diseases that could easily carry themselves to us in more effective ways if only they had actual brains and such, and even larger beasts are in general more hardy than we are. Humans have only got as far as we have through superior brain power and use of tools

[Bun]

yeh but we have guns, bombs, flamethrowers n harpoons. they don't......

[Adamm]

yes but when it's like 100billion vs 6 billion y'no. It's like saying China has the biggest population but the world vs China I think the world would win if you get me Yeah if this was to go down it would be interesting. Also I don't think I'd class micro-organisms as animals

Just everyone kill an ant and we're 10% there.

[ecstasy]

Well if we 'declared war' on the animal kingdom tomorrow then we'd definitely win because the animals would have no idea what was going on.
If the animals knew to attack us though, it wouldnt be as easy but we'd still win because we have weapons

[Black_Apalachi]

Assuming all non-humans lifeforms knew that they were meant to attack humans, the "animals" would win. There are plenty of diseases that could easily carry themselves to us in more effective ways if only they had actual brains and such, and even larger beasts are in general more hardy than we are. Humans have only got as far as we have through superior brain power and use of tools

This. If every non-human lifeform suddenly developed an instinct to hunt down any humans, there's a lot more than just sharp teeth and claws to worry about.

[Neversoft]

yes but when it's like 100billion vs 6 billion y'no. It's like saying China has the biggest population but the world vs China I think the world would win if you get me Yeah if this was to go down it would be interesting. Also I don't think I'd class micro-organisms as animals

But compare the amount of animals who could kill a human to the amount of humans would could kill an animal. Humans win. As Adamm said, everyone kill an ant and we're 10% there.

[Black_Apalachi]

But compare the amount of animals who could kill a human to the amount of humans would could kill an animal. Humans win. As Adamm said, everyone kill an ant and we're 10% there.

I believe there are estimated to be about a million ants to every human in the world

[Wig44.]

Why do people say 'Humans lose without their guns, artillery nuclear and biological weapons etc etc!!!!!!!!!!'? Because if we apply that to a lion 'Remove his claws and teeth' that seems to make no sense, we must fight the animals with no weapons when they have their weapons. In a 1 on 1 situation, with weapons humans prevail, without weapons it's still not clear cut - we have the advantage of our brains and are able to utilise the environment around us (throw rocks/stones, get to terrain that doesn't suit the animal etc) so it's very very easy to say that humans win. If we don't have our weapons (and animals don't have theirs either) it's easy. If we do have our weapons (and animals have theirs) it becomes easier.

[Gibs960]

It'd sort of be like avatar I'd say the rest of animal kingdom, although we have guns, give a tiger a forest and you won't see it till it's on top of you ripping your head off.

[lTraditional]

Humans i guess because i like others said, if we had weapons then we could easily beat them but saying that the insects are so small (Most of them) that they could easily get away and hide.