
If you know its not the same then why use the same example :S Bit silly tbh.
Its like going "ant and an elephant are the same size". Then someone says its not but you say "No I know its not like that but its as ******ed as it." ...
Nah I see Richies point it was a good example for the record but yeah it's really used but for the wrong reasons - oh I'ma close this thread now coz Richies being nasty innit. That's all it's used for
Always have courage and be kind
They are the same as in the sense the both are ******ed to give out to VIP users. Its ok I get the point habbox forum staff never make mistakes.
ofwgktadgaf
How comes this issue has only just amounted to something? The only problem VIPs were faced with in days of old were when they had their own sub-forums, and could effectively move any thread to any forum
So the point of having this feature is to just close your thread if asking a question and it gets answered? Sounds reasonable, though I remember Professor-Alex closing his threads for cooling off periods (or maybe it was Immenseman?) and it seemed okay, provided it's done within reason it should be fine, no-one was particularly annoyed with the only example I can think of. It just gives moderators one less thing to worry about![]()
Last edited by GommeInc; 01-03-2010 at 12:08 AM.
LEFT
FOM & FOW
If you need me, feel free to PM me here for contact details.
My only issues with this is when VIPs use their ability to their advantage in an argument.
"You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"
RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.
Retired from Habbox May 2011
How comes this issue has only just amounted to something? The only problem VIPs were faced with in days of old were when they had their own sub-forums, and could effectively move any thread to any forum
So the point of having this feature is to just close your thread if asking a question and it gets answered? Sounds reasonable, though I remember Professor-Alex closing his threads for cooling off periods (or maybe it was Immenseman?) and it seemed okay, provided it's done within reason it should be fine, no-one was particularly annoyed. It just gives moderators one less thing to worry about
That's a fair point, but that would be just like me saying how come a thread has only just been submitted regarding this. I only brought it up because ive only seen people recently using / abusing it.
precisely
It's just really irritating if you spent loads of time writting something and then someone goes and closes the thread for no apparent reason.
Last edited by Richie; 01-03-2010 at 12:11 AM.
ofwgktadgaf
Does it follow the same scenario as Oli posted? Where people are closing and opening their threads to their advantage in arguments?
Hmmm, perhaps only allowing VIPs to close their threads would be a better idea? It will stop them self-moderating. The only issue then would be to tackle the whole closing for the sake of advantage issue.
LEFT
FOM & FOW
If you need me, feel free to PM me here for contact details.
You are only aloud to close your threads atm, you are not aloud to re-open threads.Does it follow the same scenario as Oli posted? Where people are closing and opening their threads to their advantage in arguments?
Hmmm, perhaps only allowing VIPs to close their threads would be a better idea? It will stop them self-moderating. The only issue then would be to tackle the whole closing for the sake of advantage issue.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!