New Forum Rules ~ Feedback!

[The Professor]

They seem concise enough but with conciseness there comes a ream of loopholes, enjoy

That sentence seems terrible gramatically but I can't work out why

[Nixt]

They seem concise enough but with conciseness there comes a ream of loopholes, enjoy

That sentence seems terrible gramatically but I can't work out why

I've aimed to essentially minimise loopholes. What loopholes can you find? Additionally, the rules are designed in a way to retain the structure of the original rules but in addition to that give our moderators more discretion on top of that, so loopholes are essentially irrelevant.

[Richie]

pretty str8 forward, i still only read the red text tho the effort. btw is it just me that wenever sum1 posts a large image it breaks the forum? is it gonna be sorted so like it will shrink down and u can double click it to zoom in like with vb 3?

[Yoshimitsui]

A4. Do not post private details or information ~We do not allow you to post private information about yourself due to security concerns. Disclosing any information about another forum user without their consent is also not allowed. This includes:

•Private messages
•Reputation comments
•Private conversations (MSN, Habbo, etc.)
•Images / videos of the user or social networking profiles (Bebo, Facebook, etc.)
•Trying to organize real life meet-ups
•It is also not allowed to give out the personal details (specific address, phone number etc) of anyone, forum user or otherwise.

The 'we' and '~' need a space to match the rest . Sorry, OCD i know.

[Nixt]

Sorted .

[Blinger1]

so what did it look like before hand :S

[Black_Apalachi]

Looks very clear and easy to read while incorporating all the main points nicely. Does the description for Rule A6 not relate to threads such as; 'What are you eating?', 'What are you listening to?' etc? Also, loopholes shouldn't be a problem if you just take people down early on and don't let them take the piss.

[Hecktix]

Looks very clear and easy to read while incorporating all the main points nicely. Does the description for Rule A6 not relate to threads such as; 'What are you eating?', 'What are you listening to?' etc? Also, loopholes shouldn't be a problem if you just take people down early on and don't let them take the piss.

In my honest opinion I don't think the example given in rule A6 is very valid tbh, I think a discussion about what colour socks you are wearing would not be pointless at all. I'll look into this.

[today]

In my honest opinion I don't think the example given in rule A6 is very valid tbh, I think a discussion about what colour socks you are wearing would not be pointless at all. I'll look into this.

I hope that was sarcasm.

[Black_Apalachi]

I think it just needs an additional clause; '...with the exception of certain forum sections'. This would be more valid as those types of threads would be deemed pointless in most sections, but there are certain sections where they are OK.