Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,962
    Tokens
    66

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Isn't there like, 4 books though?
    r.i.p.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    888
    Tokens
    177

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HotelUser View Post
    They've pulled a Harry Potter.

    Apparently, movie producers like money
    Have you seen how **** book number six was? With them splitting this film (HP) into two films, it will let us catch up on what we missed in book 6 (riddles past [i.e, stealing the locket/cup from that lady, which is important seeing as it is a horcux]). It hopefully will make up for the bad sixth film

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Burnley
    Posts
    5,042
    Tokens
    3,506

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lorren View Post
    that sucks, but then again so does twilight.
    agreed.


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,277
    Tokens
    1,758

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It stops content from the books being missed out I guess, but whereas HP books are 600+ pages and I can see why they would do so, Twilight books are not.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Twilight is a rare instance where the screenplays are better than the books. The novels are so poorly written.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,071
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Cash cow says "Moooooooooo".

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •