Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    951
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Of course it should be removed. There's no doubt about it.

    People are joining it for the wrong reasons and people (such as the police) are being targeted and disrespected on the group page. It's an utter disgrace. Why should someone who took others lives for no good reason be paid tribute to? Have a bit of common sense.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,366
    Tokens
    325

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    i keep changing my opinion on this. i think even an RIP is a bit too much. hmmmm. split. there's speculation that he was tazed just before shooting himself (which would likely be an involuntary action). ermm. yeah remove them, we don't need to idolise killers.
    goodbye.

  3. #13
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,000
    Tokens
    706
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    They should allow any groups, most of these groups are a joke anyway. None of Dave's business and none of my business or your business either.

    Quote Originally Posted by alexxxxx
    i keep changing my opinion on this. i think even an RIP is a bit too much. hmmmm. split. there's speculation that he was tazed just before shooting himself (which would likely be an involuntary action). ermm. yeah remove them, we don't need to idolise killers.
    I thought you were one of the ones arguing with Hitman about banning muslim extremists? (if not, forgive me)
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 14-07-2010 at 09:16 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mank-Chest-Hair
    Posts
    4,039
    Tokens
    2,266

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    RIP should not be removed.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,832
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    No, the government should not be making such requests either. If people want to leave comments for him, then let them. They should not stop them in anyway from doing so.

    Moat's family are also suffering which some people fail to realise.
    If people are so thick that they believe he's a legend then let them be... however he was nothing but a spineless coward & a killer.

    Yes, they must be upset, but who pulled the trigger? Who caused all the trouble? Moat did.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mank-Chest-Hair
    Posts
    4,039
    Tokens
    2,266

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hitman View Post
    If people are so thick that they believe he's a legend then let them be... however he was nothing but a spineless coward & a killer.

    Yes, they must be upset, but who pulled the trigger? Who caused all the trouble? Moat did.
    I can understand peoples anger at the pages calling him a legend, but RIP should be allowed.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,832
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    I can understand peoples anger at the pages calling him a legend, but RIP should be allowed.
    I personally agree that it should be allowed - this doesn't mean I agree with it though. This sick man has left one person dead, another injured and another blind and injured (the policeman) - he is anything but a legend.

    Although these pages are nesting grounds of the stupid chavs that hate the police. Who do they call when they're in trouble... oh yeah, the police. :rolleyes:

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,366
    Tokens
    325

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    They should allow any groups, most of these groups are a joke anyway. None of Dave's business and none of my business or your business either.



    I thought you were one of the ones arguing with Hitman about banning muslim extremists? (if not, forgive me)
    i think as long as they are not inciting violence or actively promoting a killer i guess that's ok. but looking through some of these groups they are in terribly bad taste.
    goodbye.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,355
    Tokens
    334
    Habbo
    CocoCue

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It shouldn't be removed.
    If people support him, let it be. - It's not right for a PM to make a decision based on his personal opinion. It's okay for him to make decisions if it effects us as the public, but this doesn't.

  10. #20
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,000
    Tokens
    706
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexxxxx View Post
    i think as long as they are not inciting violence or actively promoting a killer i guess that's ok. but looking through some of these groups they are in terribly bad taste.
    Well it may not be to your taste but its freedom of choice and expression. If you dont like the group then you dont join, simple as that. The comments from David Cameron this evening seem to me to be another case of 'PM gets low down wif da kids and celebs' much like Brown and Blair did with their celebrity parties and comments on celebrity issues.

    Extremism on the other hand does incite the overthrow of the western system (democracy) and promotes the likes of Osama Bin Laden and so on. The line cannot be drawn at 'its offensive' because thats freedom of speech. Aslong as it does not incite violence I would say anything goes even if I may disagree with it. A lot of people promote Karl Marx for, whose idealogy killed more people than anything else in the history of humanity yet we dont call for socialist/communist groups to be banned.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •