Moderator Applications

[rnix]

Depends how good your app is I guess, I mean I've only seen you postin round the forum in the past week, dunno if you got a name change or just left for a bit but wait till the next mod app round... Might be soon, I mean the last mod apps before this one was like maybe a month? Probably less than that, depends how good the people they accepted are. NaughtyNemo got accepted though and he's a total rebel without a cause lol, so exceptions are madeee

I have had a few name changes. But i've kinda gone off the habbox staff route as i feel the departments are ran badly totally different topic so :L

[Richie]

already covered in your spam thread

Not really, I replied and proved you wrong.

[xxMATTGxx]

Thats a complete and utter lie / excuse, I got hired as habbox staff a while back & got fired hours later because 'management had made a mistake'. Don't say its different because its not. I hope your not saying general management were being unfair / unprofessional on my part

You was different circumstances that couldn't of been avoided. Either way, thanks for the thread Ryan. It's nice to see not everyone agreed with the other thread in regards of it all being wrong and what not, it wasn't like all of the Moderators chosen was under the three months mark.

[AgnesIO]

Even though i did apply (lol) i was using that as an example and i have a bad record anyway

Yes - I personally thought so infractions for 4 months warranted a good record but oh well.

I agree here though Ryan. Personally I think 3 months is a bit long - considering on a NORMAL basis applications in the moderation department are open so rarely.

Well done to everyone who got in - prove the hates wrong

[Nixt]

Just depends how nice management (lovely roxy) is compared to the not so nice management *no names*

Actually it depends how nice I am because it's me who vets the staff on the basis of their behavioural record.

Thats a complete and utter lie / excuse, I got hired as habbox staff a while back & got fired hours later because 'management had made a mistake'. Don't say its different because its not. I hope your not saying general management were being unfair / unprofessional on my part

Jin didn't want you as a member of staff. Hiring you in the first place wasn't a mistake as such - you weren't on the DNHL or anything - just the owner didn't think you were suitable. And the owner can do whatever the hell he wants.

The two situations are completely different.

[AgnesIO]

As I have said, I am sure management made the right decision. Considering I applied, if I was to choose one person out of any of the trialists to get it, it would have been Apple,??instead of moaning, why don't you go and improve your apps for next time, as by the sounds of it Apple's was better. I am sure he will hold application lessons for you jealous guys

[Mr-Trainor]

I really don't think this is as much as an issue as it's being made to look like. I know that the apps thread said 'at least 3 months' but management have admitted to making a mistake. I'm sure that the only reason they didn't notice is because Apple probably does have a great potential in becoming a good moderator and it is I presume because every other part of his application was of great quality and he easily met all of the other criteria that they didn't need to think twice, not realising that he hadn't been on the forum very long. Personally, I see him posted a lot around the forums, plus he's a member of the Welcome Committee and I'm sure he'll do well despite the lack of 1 month between now and his registration date.

[FlyingJesus]

Jin didn't want you as a member of staff. Hiring you in the first place wasn't a mistake as such - you weren't on the DNHL or anything - just the owner didn't think you were suitable. And the owner can do whatever the hell he wants.

Not that I care if Richie gets a staff position but I'm sure you'll agree (at least privately) that Jin doesn't always make good moves ie: Sammeth era not letting him actually do his job half the time, making sure certain females get certain jobs because they are female and will talk to him if he does, disregarding certain valid points on an "I don't like you" basis etc

Of course he's free to make whatever choices he wants because as you say he is the owner, but that doesn't mean it's always the right choice

[nvrspk4]

Not that I care if Richie gets a staff position but I'm sure you'll agree (at least privately) that Jin doesn't always make good moves ie: Sammeth era not letting him actually do his job half the time, making sure certain females get certain jobs because they are female and will talk to him if he does, disregarding certain valid points on an "I don't like you" basis etc

Of course he's free to make whatever choices he wants because as you say he is the owner, but that doesn't mean it's always the right choice

And? I must be missing your point...

(Ignoring whether or not the subsequent statements are true...please let's avoid that argument since I have no knowledge to actually defend Jin, though I happen to think that he has made excellent decisions over the course of his long tenure at Habbox.)

[Inseriousity.]

I agree with everything you said Ryan
Managers aren't that strict on the criteria. Dare I say it but I imagine it actually becomes an excuse if anyone suggests 'WHY DIDNT I GET THE JOB' (excluding the infractions/warnings criteria, that one's important) so the criteria is very loose and managers are allowed to make exceptions to the norm. Critics say that those under 3 months may not have applied but I imagine there were a lot of people with a join date Sept 2010, Aug 2010 because they tend to give it a go anyway and I don't see many of them in here saying "That's so unfair! I would have applied if it wasn't for that", probably because they already did.