Harry Potter Will NOT be in 3D!

[HotelUser]

I was so looking forward to watching this in 3d

[Misawa]

3D is a shoddy gimmick and it lowers picture quality. 2D forever.

[MJJ]

I'm quite happy with this.

I would rather have a normal 2D version rather than seeing the release date pushed back to January or whatever just to accommodate 3D.

[AgnesIO]

Never seen the obsession in 3D. It was around like 50 years ago lol It is a gimmick

Would rather watch a film without getting a migraine, and not have to wear glasses.

[Misawa]

The truth of the matter is, Warner saw a post-converted reel, realisd how awful it is, and the ditched it.

[Jam]

The truth of the matter is, Warner saw a post-converted reel, realisd how awful it is, and the ditched it.

Even though all non native 3D is ****e, which the whole world should have realized by now, especially those who ruddy film the damn things.

[dbgtz]

3D is a shoddy gimmick and it lowers picture quality. 2D forever.

Gotta start somewhere, its not like we instantly got blu-ray hd. Youre basically saying video tapes and records should not have existed because its bad quality.

Tbh I dont see why they dont (unless they do re-release them all as someone suggested), always best to give both options to get more £$£$£$.

[Misawa]

There's a stark difference between picture quality and an entire visual dimension.

[Art]

I'm glad they changed it. If all 7(8) eventually do come out in 3D then I will probably see them anyway ;p

After a big fan revolt

Did that really happen??

EDIT: Actually I read that Harry Potter was fast approaching the title of highest grossing... film series or whatever. Star Wars is currently at number one which is supposedly why they're planning on rereleasing their films in 3D. WB probably just did this so they can try out gross them after haha.

[Misawa]

Highest if you don't adjust for inflation.