yep agree with this completely questions need to be asked about the ref nothing else. It would have been worse to go back on the goal
Gomes wasn't given a freekick but he still went to take one and Nani capitalized on the situation.
There was nothing wrong with the goal.
All people saying Mark Clattenburg will be stabbed or should go into league two should rethink. He is (in my opinion) one of the more respected premier league referees. He handled the game well and usually does.
Gomes was an idiot and - should the linesman have wanted the free kick he would have explained this in full to Mark and I can't see how or why he should over rule a decision like this.
The linesman said it was a freekick, Gomes lined up to take it, nani kicked it in? If anything that's a red card :|
DJ Robbie
Former Jobs: Events Organiser, News Reporter, HxHD
No he doesn't?
The referee is in charge of the match, not the linesmen.
The referee decides whether or not the linesman is right, and ultimately decides what decision to give. He doesn't have to go with the linesman's decision at all (although the referee normally does).
used to fix usertitles n stuff
last +rep: -nickrep points: 16361
There was no consultation with the linesman and the referee before the goal or during and play was stopped after Nani had taken the ball from Gomez to net it. Clattenburg then went and spoke with his linesman and awarded the goal.
I haven't had a proper look but the referee makes the final decision. Regardless of it actually being a free-kick, if the referee doesn't blow his whistle then the game carries on - play until the whistle.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!