Grammar change?

[Aidenn]

Its there to do a job simply stating post count won't increase in that section, it does its job, end of.

[Mathew]

But "Post counts" is known as "Post count".

But "Post count do not increase" doesn't make sense.
I think if you're silly enough to not understand what it means, then you shouldn't be on the internet in the first place

[triston220]

But "Post count do not increase" doesn't make sense.
I think if you're silly enough to not understand what it means, then you shouldn't be on the internet in the first place

That's why I suggest it be changed to "Post count does not increase." And if I don't know what it means, then how would I be able to give a suitable alternative?

[Nemo]

That's why I suggest it be changed to "Post count does not increase." And if I don't know what it means, then how would I be able to give a suitable alternative?

If you dont understand what it means now then you're an idiot plain and simple. You do understand what it means and no one has ever had trouble understanding what it means so its a stupid hypothetical situation. Its just nitpicking like people have said and there's honestly no point discussing this any further. I dont even know why im replying to this because you cant grasp the basic fact that no one really gives a damn about 2 words that make sense changed or not. Just give it up.

[Inseriousity.]

Personally, I think people are being a bit harsh on you!

I agree with you that it would sound better with your alternative but I also agree with the others that it isn't such a big thing. I'm on the fence... it's not very comfy but oh well.

[myke]

Are you really that bored? lol

Looks alright to me, but adding 'do not' or w.e it is you said would make it better but it's really not much of a problem

[triston220]

If you dont understand what it means now then you're an idiot plain and simple. You do understand what it means and no one has ever had trouble understanding what it means so its a stupid hypothetical situation. Its just nitpicking like people have said and there's honestly no point discussing this any further. I dont even know why im replying to this because you cant grasp the basic fact that no one really gives a damn about 2 words that make sense changed or not. Just give it up.

I said that it doesn't really matter, but people keep replying, so I reply to them. I'm waiting for the thread to be closed.

Personally, I think people are being a bit harsh on you!

I agree with you that it would sound better with your alternative but I also agree with the others that it isn't such a big thing. I'm on the fence... it's not very comfy but oh well.

Thank you. It's not that big a deal but I thought I would mention it anyway.

[Nemo]

I said that it doesn't really matter, but people keep replying, so I reply to them. I'm waiting for the thread to be closed.

By replying to them, you're defending your arguement, thus continuing the thread. The thread is likely to not be closed, so if you stop replying, so will people, and it'll die down in no time.

[triston220]

By replying to them, you're defending your arguement, thus continuing the thread. The thread is likely to not be closed, so if you stop replying, so will people, and it'll die down in no time.

I've requested for the thread to be locked. And if you read the content of my posts you will realize that I'm not trying to defend my 'argument'.

[Nemo]

That's why I suggest it be changed to "Post count does not increase." And if I don't know what it means, then how would I be able to give a suitable alternative?

I've requested for the thread to be locked. And if you read the content of my posts you will realize that I'm not trying to defend my 'argument'.

That is quite clearly defending your post. No way around that.

And they won't lock it because locking your own threads is a VIP Feature. So it doesnt matter if you request it.