Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,392
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richie View Post
    The rule should apply both ways. If a post has a +1 beside it even though it may be a pointless comment, surely that should be removed too as its only fair?
    There should (don't quote me on it as I know the thread has changed recently) be a clause within the rep instructions thread stating that by reporting negative rep problems you are submitting yourself to having your rep over the past month checked and pointless positive reputation should be removed. Nicola is doing this as far as I am aware however I will remind her as well, as I agree it's important to keep it up on both sides of the scale.
    "You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"

    RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
    Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.

    Retired from Habbox May 2011


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    6,246
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Nickiest.

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dilusionate View Post
    Why has 'Report Reputation Problems' received its own, private sub-forum and 'Report Infraction Problems' is still public? Would some people not be uncomfortable publicly reporting their infractions just like negative reputations? There are often some arguments in the thread and it creates a negative atmosphere. If it's made private, infractions and arguments would be a lot more confidential.

    Thoughts?
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    I feel it should be allowed to directly PM the forum manager if you really want to keep it private.
    As Oli said the report infractions thread has been left there publicly so people can learn from other people's mistakes and learn why what they did was wrong and hopefully not make a repeat offence.

    Quote Originally Posted by Richie View Post
    What part isn't true oli? Have things honestly changed that much? are management not overprotective anymore? Everyone reports -reps and if my memory serves correctly there were threads in the past about how management remove rep even if it isn't pointless.

    Oh and the above is more of an opinion than a statement.
    The part that isn't true is that no rep gets removed there have been some instances last week where I haven't removed the rep because they deserved to get the rep and it wasn't just pointless.

    Quote Originally Posted by Richie View Post
    The rule should apply both ways. If a post has a +1 beside it even though it may be a pointless comment, surely that should be removed too as its only fair?
    As said by Oli again, any pointless +rep will be removed also. It is stated in the report reputation instructions thread.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •