We've got Stoke later.
2-0 to the Blues hopefully.
We've got Stoke later.
2-0 to the Blues hopefully.
Jordan
Aguero looks very good, shame Chelsea didn't get him (instead going for the 13m more expensive Torres...)
Torres did look good against Stoke though. I'm not just annoyed or anything because Chelsea drew, but is it only me who hates the way Stoke play football? They are incredibly rough, outlined by shawcross's hack on Torres. They're a good team and I do hope they do well this year, but sometimes looking at how they play theirrugbyfootball does annoy me.
used to fix usertitles n stuff
last +rep: -nickrep points: 16361
I totally agree with you.Aguero looks very good, shame Chelsea didn't get him (instead going for the 13m more expensive Torres...)
Torres did look good against Stoke though. I'm not just annoyed or anything because Chelsea drew, but is it only me who hates the way Stoke play football? They are incredibly rough, outlined by shawcross's hack on Torres. They're a good team and I do hope they do well this year, but sometimes looking at how they play theirrugbyfootball does annoy me.
They are always hacking away, it was only the other year they injured one of Arsenal's young players. I did think they kept targeting Torres.Chelsea deserved at least one penalty, which they didn't get. Torres is looking quite good now, hopefully Villas Boas can unlock his talent a bit more and get him on the score sheet on a regular basis.
At the moment I'm following the Forest game, there isn't a live commentary though unfortunately. Apart from the paid one on their site - which is a rip off.
Jordan
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!