Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,892
    Tokens
    5,554

    Latest Awards:


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Reading, Berkshire
    Posts
    2,260
    Tokens
    12,202
    Habbo
    :Jin:

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I second on the 1000D or any of the entry - midrange canons.

    The main question is do you want a DSLR or just a point and click camera. If you have no intention of learning photography than go with a Panasonic Lumix point range point and click. For P&C's the lumix is pretty impressive and has a very intelligent automatic mode.

    However if you think you can put the time in to learn how to take good photos with a SLR then go with either Nikon or Canon. I prefer canon over nikon due to their menu system and the availability of second hand lenses however nikon do feel to have a better build quality.

    Personally I would rather edge you towards a DSLR but it is one of those things you have to have an interest in. I could take a far better photo with point and click than someone who doesn't know how to use their DSLR.
    Last edited by Jin; 03-10-2011 at 06:47 PM.


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,664
    Tokens
    1,679

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jin View Post
    I second on the 1000D or any of the entry - midrange canons.

    The main question is do you want a DSLR or just a point and click camera. If you have no intention of learning photography than go with a Panasonic Lumix point range point and click. For P&C's the lumix is pretty impressive and has a very intelligent automatic mode.

    However if you think you can put the time in to learn how to take good photos with a SLR then go with either Nikon or Canon. I prefer canon over nikon due to their menu system and the availability of second hand lenses however nikon do feel to have a better build quality.

    Personally I would rather edge you towards a DSLR but it is one of those things you have to have an interest in. I could take a far better photo with point and click than someone who doesn't know how to use their DSLR.
    Why would you recommend a camera from the last generation? The 1000D is out of date and has been replaced by the 1100D, which can be found for roughly the same price. The 1100D has a higher specification and also a video feature.


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Reading, Berkshire
    Posts
    2,260
    Tokens
    12,202
    Habbo
    :Jin:

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hashterix View Post
    Why would you recommend a camera from the last generation? The 1000D is out of date and has been replaced by the 1100D, which can be found for roughly the same price. The 1100D has a higher specification and also a video feature.
    On paper the 1100D makes more sense but I have used both and still prefer a 1000D. I don't like the 1100D as it feels cheaper to me in the hand (than usual) and the camera feels a bit clumsy but that is just me. Also I am a bit of a conservative when it comes to cameras and prefer to have a video camera to take video (XL-1S) and camera to take photos, I am sure it is great for those one off videos of auntie sue blowing out her birthday candles but I always feel there is a compromise in cameras that do video and video cameras that do photos.

    Also if it was my first DSLR I would go secondhand and cheap, people upgrade their bodies more so than their lenses that way if it isn't for you it hasn't come at such a big expense.
    Last edited by Jin; 03-10-2011 at 07:44 PM.


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,664
    Tokens
    1,679

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jin View Post
    On paper the 1100D makes more sense but I have used both and still prefer a 1000D. I don't like the 1100D as it feels cheaper to me in the hand (than usual) and the camera feels a bit clumsy but that is just me. Also I am a bit of a conservative when it comes to cameras and prefer to have a video camera to take video (XL-1S) and camera to take photos, I am sure it is great for those one off videos of auntie sue blowing out her birthday candles but I always feel there is a compromise in cameras that do video and video cameras that do photos.

    Also if it was my first DSLR I would go secondhand and cheap, people upgrade their bodies more so than their lenses that way if it isn't for you it hasn't come at such a big expense.
    Feels fine to me, doesn't have a rubber grip but it doesn't feel clumsy to me.

    As for your point about wanting cheap, most people i've seen are trying for at least £250 for a second hand 1000d body, anything less and your best bet is there is something wrong with it. I guess it's the difference between going out and buying an iphone 3G and an iphone 4, they do the same thing but the newer one has more features although costing slightly more. I'd still personally go with the new one over the old.

    As for the video feature compromising image quality? I wouldn't say so: http://hashterix.deviantart.com/gallery/


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Halifax NS, Alpine NJ (USA)
    Posts
    2,766
    Tokens
    2,318

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    i have a digital rebel xti
    I'm at a point in my life where I don't care if you like me or you don't. If you like me, cool. If you don't, meh.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •