
Not really, asking for Facebook/Skype etc. suchas in this ban is a perfectly acceptable ban reason.
I do get that as an acceptable reason, it just seems that every which way I look, lots of people are getting banned. I'd be worried that if I were speaking to someone I actually know would be classed as explicit i.e. like sending personal info or arranging a meet.
I mean I got banned for my username. It just seems to have clamped down so much more than it used to be.
superhappy.
After the Channel 4 investigation, they've had too.I do get that as an acceptable reason, it just seems that every which way I look, lots of people are getting banned. I'd be worried that if I were speaking to someone I actually know would be classed as explicit i.e. like sending personal info or arranging a meet.
I mean I got banned for my username. It just seems to have clamped down so much more than it used to be.
Think I read up about this. Is it because they were seen to have little evasive action in preventing chats - which lost investor confidence?
Obviously you should protect your younger users - but I think that they may have just overstepped the mark in order to boost credence in believing that Habbo is safe. I mean banning people for use of words like Teabags, boxers or something else, to me just seems alittle off - surely I think that it should at least be reviewed before handing out perm bans freely and frequently.
Last edited by Teabags; 12-09-2012 at 08:54 PM.
superhappy.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!