Children's carer banned from caring for children for being a member of UKIP

[Inseriousity.]

It's not what we have now, it's what you think we have. There's a difference!

I don't think it's failed because across all the cultures is the idea of wanting to live in peace. Their daily routine may differ slightly (a Muslim going to a prayer room, for example) but as the vast majority wants to live their life freely and avoid as much trouble as possible then they can live together in harmony.

[-:Undertaker:-]

While I don't think it's right by any means, but in both recent incidents you believe that the couples should be able to foster and the carer shouldn't be banned. However, when that gay couple were turned away from that hotel you said it was OK as the people have the right to decide. Could you not just say the same here?

The difference is private property rights, the fundemental in any free society. Had the children's original parents asked for the children to be removed from the care of individuals for whatever reasons, then that would be correct even though i'd disagree with it - because it's their children. The social services on the other hand ought to be neutral as they are part of the state.

It's not what we have now, it's what you think we have. There's a difference!

I don't think it's failed because across all the cultures is the idea of wanting to live in peace. Their daily routine may differ slightly (a Muslim going to a prayer room, for example) but as the vast majority wants to live their life freely and avoid as much trouble as possible then they can live together in harmony.

So there are not large areas of this country where you will not hear the English language spoken anymore? come on..

And again you're confusing the issue with religious ceremonies, completely bypassing my valid point that radically different cultures cannot exist together under the same legal and political system.

[GommeInc]

So let me get this straight... UKIP is a party made up of people who like to eat and/or beat up children for fun? That seems to be the impression lately. I have no idea why political affiliation need play a single part in bringing up a child or looking after children. If they've already passed the already thorough checks then the party they associate themselves with need not mean a thing. Ridiculous, as per usual.