pictures of yourself as avatars / sigs

[velvet]

idk i don't personally like the idea of being able to see peoples pics as their avatars, not that appealing for me

.......................... your pic is of someones face.

i'm my own idol so why can't i have my face as my av

[FlyingJesus]

tbh I'd rather see a pic of Jade than that tosspot Morrissey

[velvet]

**** off morrissey will still be somewhere

[FlyingJesus]

Yeah probably preaching about how bad it is to have pets because all animals are spiritually superior to humans for no apparent reason. I had 6 sausages for dinner and 2 freeze pops

[xxMATTGxx]

Wasn't it more of a Community vote about this rule rather than management. As I remember quite a few people saying they don't wish to see users faces in avatars and signatures.

[Adam]

don't understand that rule though as you can just put a photo of an ugly celebrity though. but, democracy rules.

[velvet]

.................. well can you make an exception for me

[Chris]

wasn't it because they didn't want everyones faces plastered all over the forum?

I don't know the actual reason the rule was originally implemented, but this is probably why it wont be changing.

[velvet]

I don't know the actual reason the rule was originally implemented, but this is probably why it wont be changing.

but we have peoples faces plastered all over the forum anyway lol, my sig used to be this:


it was removed because it's my body... i don't see what's wrong with it lol

[Chris]

but we have peoples faces plastered all over the forum anyway lol, my sig used to be this:


it was removed because it's my body... i don't see what's wrong with it lol

People generally just keep pictures of themselves in the papoy thread.