Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    God forbid a party changes their policies over time to better reflect the changing views of the electorate.
    Not sure the views of the electorate have ever been to "kick every non-Britain out of the country in a few months"...


  2. #12
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,186
    Tokens
    331
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    What about when they went from a NO TAX EVER party to INCREASE TAXES TO HELP POOR FAMILIES in one swift move after realising that it's poor people who are the most likely to be enraged about immigrants "stealing" low level jobs

    It's not changing small ideas to suit the electorate, it's changing radically to suit the parts of the electorate they think they can manipulate out of desperation
    Actually if you look at their proposed policies as far as I am aware they advocate lowering taxes on both wealthy earners and poorer earners with a two-stage flat tax - makes sense to me, as does prioritising lower wage earners before higher wage earners.

    Quote Originally Posted by Payasam View Post
    Not sure the views of the electorate have ever been to "kick every non-Britain out of the country in a few months"...
    That has never been policy and you know it.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    God forbid a party changes their policies over time to better reflect the changing views of the electorate.
    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    That has never been policy and you know it.
    Did you bother to read what I had quoted? I clearly quoted Chippiewill suggesting that the party had changed its policies to fit what the electorate was currently thinking. I agree, parties do do this all the time.

    BUT, if that is the case, that would be an admission that UKIP previously wanted to gradually deport people of other nationalities - now, I am not saying they did (or do), however Chippiewill's post implies that the party used to think what Mark Reckless said, however is changing its policy based on the changing views of the British electorate.


  4. #14
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,186
    Tokens
    331
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Payasam View Post
    Did you bother to read what I had quoted? I clearly quoted Chippiewill suggesting that the party had changed its policies to fit what the electorate was currently thinking. I agree, parties do do this all the time.

    BUT, if that is the case, that would be an admission that UKIP previously wanted to gradually deport people of other nationalities - now, I am not saying they did (or do), however Chippiewill's post implies that the party used to think what Mark Reckless said, however is changing its policy based on the changing views of the British electorate.
    The policy was as I understand it that a visa system would be introduced as it exists already for non-EU immigrants (and which by the rest of the world operates on) where by when Great Britain ceases to be under the auspices of the community treaties, former EU 'citizens' would have to apply for visas to continue their stay: those who qualify for visas would be allowed to stay, those who don't qualify (ie they are out of work) would have to leave within a certain time.

    That's hardly wanting to deport people of other nationalities. That's just fair.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill
    God forbid a party changes their policies over time to better reflect the changing views of the electorate.
    Interestingly I just watched a live debate on Sky News about ten minutes ago between Douglas Murray and some journalist about Ken Clarke's recent comments, and the woman just sat there basically saying parties should ignore what the voters want. Predictably, she also came out with the waycism line before the debate had ended after Murray had taken her apart like a piece of cheap flat-pack IKEA furniture.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 23-11-2014 at 06:06 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •