I'm confused, and probably have misunderstood this.
But how is banning pictures on a cigarette package going to 'save lives'?
I'm confused, and probably have misunderstood this.
But how is banning pictures on a cigarette package going to 'save lives'?
Which is what a lot of people in the study thought.
They're not banning pictures. They're banning branding which is statistically proven to reduce smoking rates and raise the age at which people start smoking. I think people in this thread are seriously underestimating the power of branding to influence our decisions.
Chippiewill.