Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Why is it not unreasonable to dismiss property rights in the case of just one family idgi
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,481
    Tokens
    3,140

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post

    That's the justification all regimes or radicals use when it comes to property rights. Property rights are property rights, you either believe in them or you don't.

    Can't say "I believe in property rights but I quite fancy the castle across the road that my neighbour owns so the state should seize that."
    Well that's not really fair. The monarchy already has hundreds of other exceptions surrounding them. I don't expect they pay inheritance tax.
    Chippiewill.


  3. #13
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,162
    Tokens
    127
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    Why is it not unreasonable to dismiss property rights in the case of just one family idgi
    "I believe in trial by jury - except for Jews."
    Do I really then believe in trial by jury as a founding principle in law and liberty? I don't think so.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    5,642
    Tokens
    12,065
    Habbo
    djclune

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Right of conquest didn't abide by property rights, did it?
    That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
    Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats

  5. #15
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,162
    Tokens
    127
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    Well that's not really fair. The monarchy already has hundreds of other exceptions surrounding them. I don't expect they pay inheritance tax.
    Well that's a different argument. If you abolished the Monarchy then obviously those tax breaks which comes from the Duchy rights and all that would be ended and they'd be liable that and other taxes. But principles in basic English law like property rights are a lot different to general taxation.

    All hypothetical though as with any luck, we'll never come to this issue with a President Bennett installing solar panels on Buckingham Palace.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by The Don View Post
    Right of conquest didn't abide by property rights, did it?
    That'd depend if you wanted to open the can of worms with retrospective law.

    Although I wouldn't put it past the Greens to propose a Year Zero.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 24-01-2015 at 09:46 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Don View Post
    Right of conquest didn't abide by property rights, did it?
    Pretty sure Lizzie didn't rob any palaces from anyone. Sins of the father is a terrible way to operate
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    5,642
    Tokens
    12,065
    Habbo
    djclune

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    Pretty sure Lizzie didn't rob any palaces from anyone. Sins of the father is a terrible way to operate
    Not saying we should operate like that, just pointing out that dans joke example "I quite fancy the castle across the road that my neighbour owns so the state should seize that" is pretty much how the land became theirs in the first place
    That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
    Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •