Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 22 of 23 FirstFirst ... 12181920212223 LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 226
  1. #211
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    6,228
    Tokens
    1,145

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Carvalho View Post
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqAt2akPHJ8 is a way he could of done it
    Been posted hundreds of times.
    i'm out of touch, i'm out of love
    i'll pick you up when you're getting down
    and out of all these things i've done
    i think i love you better now

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,308
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    to me, whether it's fake or not doesn't matter, it was exciting to watch and he's a great entertainer
    jen&hev4eva

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MizMe93 View Post
    I think that might be because of the content of his shows, he cant really have people touching him or people would suspect that they're in on it, handing him something etc. perhaps? I don't know I only just started watching the episode on channel 4 catch up and noticed that too.
    Possibly. He seemed dead freaky about it though.

    Btw, whenever he does anything like getting the woman to touch the mouse or getting the guy to stamp on the knife, we'll know it's always not really there so I kind of hope he avoids those kinds of tricks from now on.

    I did believe there was a knife under a cup but then again, he probably would have got the guy to actually sign a legal agreement. I also thought the guy was a bit actor-ish because you'd either do it with the hope you stamped on the knife to get the money, or you just wouldn't agree to doing it. And half a million for a knife through the foot was a bit excessive I thought .

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robald View Post
    Possibly. He seemed dead freaky about it though.

    Btw, whenever he does anything like getting the woman to touch the mouse or getting the guy to stamp on the knife, we'll know it's always not really there so I kind of hope he avoids those kinds of tricks from now on.

    I did believe there was a knife under a cup but then again, he probably would have got the guy to actually sign a legal agreement. I also thought the guy was a bit actor-ish because you'd either do it with the hope you stamped on the knife to get the money, or you just wouldn't agree to doing it. And half a million for a knife through the foot was a bit excessive I thought .
    it would be different if it was you tho lol, and, i wouldve actually asked for more if im honest. I mean, it would permanently scar you, and could leave you slightly toeless.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kk. View Post
    it would be different if it was you tho lol, and, i wouldve actually asked for more if im honest. I mean, it would permanently scar you, and could leave you slightly toeless.
    I would have discussed the exact potential risks with a doctor then thought about it. I was expecting him to say like a grand though haha .
    Last edited by Black_Apalachi; 12-09-2009 at 05:54 PM.

  6. #216
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brandon View Post
    He even said it was a trick at the end. Plus it explains why he was holding a 'snowflake' as in frozen, and why at the end only half of the productions logo was on. He even explains in this that he worked on four events of misdirection. I can't believe how people still don't believe it's a trick. :rolleyes:
    That is fair enough but I highly doubt what he did was technology related, he's an illusionist, it's not camera trickery he is good at, the least believable method as far as I'm concerned is that it was a "split-screen", it's just not what he does, misdirection or not, that's not misdirecting anyone in the sense "hey look at what I'm doing" ("but don't look over here") that's directly editting footage in order to mislead, again, not what he does.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    an illusion is defined as:

    An erroneous perception of reality. or
    An erroneous concept or belief.

    so basically, making you believe something else. Which is basically what he did, twice. He first made you think he predicted the lottery, and then gave a bogus reason as to how. Misdirecting you.

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kk. View Post
    an illusion is defined as:

    An erroneous perception of reality. or
    An erroneous concept or belief.

    so basically, making you believe something else. Which is basically what he did, twice. He first made you think he predicted the lottery, and then gave a bogus reason as to how. Misdirecting you.
    We'll see what comes of it, I highly doubt it's a "camera trick" still, I don't care what people think, he wouldn't be where he is now with camera tricks, how do you know he didn't want you to THINK it was a camera trick? Misdirecting from what he said, to something completely false? Though all of his shows he makes someone do exactly what he wants without them knowing he wants them to do it, could be the same here, no one but him really knows the real truth, I'm still against the belief that he would use camera tricks.

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    haha, i know, i was just saying that an illusion basically means making you believe something else. of course, it could be anything, and only him, channel 4, the production team and the camera man know what really happened. Just, his method really doesnt work lol. i would like to believe that it wasnt camera trickery but i really do think it was. Its still a brilliant start to his series though, and the one thing that made me laugh about it was that he pulled in 2.7million viewers and the lottery draws themselves brought in only 2.4mil

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    4,918
    Tokens
    126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neil View Post
    We'll see what comes of it, I highly doubt it's a "camera trick" still, I don't care what people think, he wouldn't be where he is now with camera tricks, how do you know he didn't want you to THINK it was a camera trick? Misdirecting from what he said, to something completely false? Though all of his shows he makes someone do exactly what he wants without them knowing he wants them to do it, could be the same here, no one but him really knows the real truth, I'm still against the belief that he would use camera tricks.
    Explain how it was done if it wasn't camera trickery then?

    It's very likely split-screen and the link posted previously has evidence why.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •