To determine how many coco cops are in various people's cereal bowls obviously.
In reality they should just impose their own rule:
~ Do not posts threads which only allow for short, one or two word answers and do not promote active discussion.
Last edited by Chippiewill; 19-05-2013 at 01:37 PM.
Chippiewill.
Omg. Do you seriously think people are going to go pour out a bowl of coco pops to the exact amount they'd eat, then count them all to get the exact number of how many is in there. And then, do you really think people are finding that information to be interesting in any way? The thread has no point.
Of course as management have already kindly stated, you don't have to read it.Omg. Do you seriously think people are going to go pour out a bowl of coco pops to the exact amount they'd eat, then count them all to get the exact number of how many is in there. And then, do you really think people are finding that information to be interesting in any way? The thread has no point.
Chippiewill.
tbqh i find it very interesting nglOmg. Do you seriously think people are going to go pour out a bowl of coco pops to the exact amount they'd eat, then count them all to get the exact number of how many is in there. And then, do you really think people are finding that information to be interesting in any way? The thread has no point.
i used to put the names of my favourite singers here... then i realised nobody cared
The entire situation is all one massive reductio ad absurdum, the point of the thread is to force management's hand so that they have to concede that quality is in fact a factor in regards to moderation of the forum. Either that or they're massively inconsistent.
Chippiewill.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!