counterproductive moderation.

[Matthew]

That book thread is just stupid. I'm not trying to target the user but have seen how many meaningless threads or posts that person has posted in the past two days?

[Catchy]

I'm sorry but @GirlNextDoor15; why do you actually care so much? Surely it's not affecting you that much... If it is I suggest you seek professional help.

[buttons]

His post did not positively contribute to the thread topic, therefore it broke the rules. This has always been the case, and always will unless we get told differently. In regards to your post, can you explain to me how your comment actually helps the thread starter with the question he gave you? Because I can't see how it helps. Naming someone who has insomnia and then just leaving the thread isn't really needed in a thread that wants advice. If you think differently I ask that you PM @scott; and @brandon; and not scream in a feedback thread.

why is it a problem if it doesn't positively contribute to a thread? WHY is it only spam where we're allowed to post off-topic and actually converse with each other? you keep restricting us from making witty comments which DO contribute to threads, you restrict us from interacting with each other. all we can do in every thread outside of spam is pretty much post in a robotic fashion, you answer the thread and that's all you can do because everything else is considered pointlessly posting. again, i've never been warned for pointlessly posting until yesterday because usually i don't reply to someone who has quoted me and instead i POINTLESSLY rep or end up commenting on their profile because i know if i quote them with a reply then i'll be warned. it's much more logical to reply there and then.

it's doing absolutely no harm at all to post a witty comment, it rarely takes the thread in to a completely different direction and hardly anyone has a full blown off topic conversation in threads with a specific topic. you guys never answer that, why is it so bad? why don't you use your brain to see whether or not the comment is going to disrupt the thread instead of editing harmless, funny posts that bring a little character to a thread that is otherwise serious and boring.

ffs that was you who are clearly trying to better yourself. It wasn't pointless and so, why do we have to accept what a MOD said? And how do you know it's not going to contribute positively? He wasn't posting rubbish but I agree the followed comment was. It was meant to be a positive post if you MODs aren't taking it to another level. I know she was asking for advice but she obviously has this misconception about insomnia and all I'm saying is no, it's not insomnia. FGS. It's a discussion! Don't expect us all to give them straight answers and hence, keeping our mouth shut just in case some biased MOD come and tell us off! And I get that a lot. I guess that's how some MOD handles feedback. How professional..

i'm gonna be honest with you, i reported that post. the only reason i reported it was because stephen's was the only post that was edited and yours wasn't even though it LOOKED what they'd call pointless to me. i did it to prove a point. they were clearly editing it because it was stephen's and he has a history of 'pointless posting'. + i was right. they only edited your post not because it was pointless but because it was reported. mods have always been that way tbh, they edit something because someone tells them too.

I'll consider reading this when you learn to speak to me properly.

you're a super moderator. your job is to read and reply to everyone so i don't see where your attitude comes from. the only person that would get away with that back in the day was probably nvrspk cause well, it's nvrspk. funny how you're always the first to reply to threads rule breaking then when asked to actually do something it's ~out of your control~

[Mathew]

IT'S NOT A POINTLESS POST! IT CAN BE VIEWED AS A QUESTION OUT OF CURIOSITY TO SOMEONE WHO FINDS PUTTING FRESH ORANGE JUICE ON HIS FACE WILL KEEP THEM AWAKE! IT IS ALL RELATED TO THE THREAD AND YET, YOU SAID IT'S POINTLESS? HOW COULD IT BE? DO YOU JUDGE POSTS BASED ON WHO POSTED IT INSTEAD OF WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS? WELL, I RECKON IT WON'T BE CONSIDERED AS POINTLESS IF A STAFF POSTED IT THEN. IT'S SO BIASED! SAME GOES TO THIS POST! http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=742904 WHY IS IT POINTLESS? CHAIRMAN MAO IS FAMOUS FOR HIS INSOMNIA PROBLEMS AND I'M JUST MAKING A POINT OF WHAT INSOMNIA IS WITHOUT LENGTHY EXPLANATIONS LIKE THE ABOVE POSTS! I DON'T EXPECT EVERYONE TO KNOW WHO CHAIRMAN MAO IS BUT AT LEAST, USE YOUR COMMON SENSE TO KNOW THAT I'M POSTING FOR A REASON!

OH AND THERE WAS NO POINTLESS COMMENTS AFTER MY POST. SO WHY IS IT POINTLESS???!

Edited by SyrupyMonkey (Assistant General Manager): Please do not post pointlessly, try to contribute to the thread.

[beth]

please don't pointless post @Mathew;

right so considering mods have been replying to this thread etc i know yr online: DO YOU LIKE YR BOOKS WIV OR WIVOUT PICZ LOLOLOL is still in anime/books, so is this an acceptable example of a thread?

[David]

please don't pointless post @Mathew;

right so considering mods have been replying to this thread etc i know yr online: DO YOU LIKE YR BOOKS WIV OR WIVOUT PICZ LOLOLOL is still in anime/books, so is this an acceptable example of a thread?

i dont think he got the memo about managers growing up and not pointless posting

[beth]

i dont think he got the memo about managers growing up and not pointless posting

i do miss that fine hotel using fella.

no but seriously: that book thread it's still open and people are legit posting. like come the **** on, who has a preference. you don't walk into a library and go NO SORRY I CANNOT STAND BY THIS BOOK IT HAS NO PICTURES.

[GirlNextDoor15]

Oh is that what a staff will tell someone who posts feedback in order to improve the forum? What a good example of how ignorant some staff can be

[Catchy]

Oh is that what a staff will tell someone who posts feedback in order to improve the forum? What a good example of how ignorant some staff can be

No but you're making a mountain out of a mole hill, clearly the user didn't post twice intentionally he went back and added something which is 100% fine. I'm not being ignorant what so ever.

[GirlNextDoor15]

No but you're making a mountain out of a mole hill, clearly the user didn't post twice intentionally he went back and added something which is 100% fine. I'm not being ignorant what so ever.

*SHE
Who knows what your 'professional help' means. That at least proves that you're too immature. It's like saying 'i suggest you to gth if it affects you that much'.
Oopsie.. offensiveee.. oh no wait. the mods won't edit it cause you're a staff.. ahhh i see