Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


View Poll Results: What party will you be voting for?

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • Conservatives

    10 29.41%
  • Labour

    17 50.00%
  • Liberal Democrats

    3 8.82%
  • SNP

    1 2.94%
  • UKIP

    1 2.94%
  • Green

    1 2.94%
  • Other

    1 2.94%
Page 25 of 48 FirstFirst ... 1521222324252627282935 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 250 of 475
  1. #241
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    209
    Tokens
    1,451
    Habbo
    hungryfront

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    That's not the same thing as the council, the council are the ones who actually run the place and they're Labour since 2011
    The council still only gets so much money and can only do so much with that money - they have to stop spending somewhere, and Theresa wants that to be the NHS.

    Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
    just here to be political considering there's been a pretty one-sided viewpoint on here for a couple of years x

  2. #242

    Default

    Exactly!! Agreed.

    Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk

  3. #243
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,088
    Tokens
    1,257
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Let's hope the historical trend isn't bucked.

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryfront View Post
    You complain he's going to take us back to the 70s, yet bring up his views from years ago. We should not be focusing on a politicians past which is seemingly your only point against Jeremy Corbyn, but focusing on the party and the politician going forward and their policies, which is where Theresa May is flawed.
    Hang on a second, virtually everyone of his supporters have always said we should focus on his past and his record given he's held the same views for all these years. And it's perfectly true, he has. So let's hold him to them.

    He's unashamedly republican, pacifist, would hand over Ulster, the Falklands and Gibraltar. That's PM material?

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryfront
    You say Jeremy Corbyn is against the army, which is fantastically untrue and exaggerated, he's just against bombing people but is putting democracy above his own views.
    EVERYBODY is, in an ideal fantasy world, against bombing people from The Queen to Theresa May to me. Who honestly is eager to drop bombs? But the world is more complicated than that, and certainly is when you're the head of the British government and having to take decisions with your cabinet on national security. The naive worldview of a Sixth Former who wants peace for the people's of Earth is all well and good, but no good for a prospective Prime Minister to hold.

    He's on *record* as saying he wants to cut back the already-struggling Armed Forces.

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryfront
    Theresa May has continued to cut funding for this nation's future, when without a future, we don't really have a "strong and stable" nation. It'll collapse in a few years under her.
    The cuts needed after five years of a spend thrift Corbyn government would make any cuts now seem small change.

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryfront
    The council still only gets so much money and can only do so much with that money - they have to stop spending somewhere, and Theresa wants that to be the NHS.
    This insane worshipping of the NHS has got to stop, including from the Conservatives who are also at it. You'd think the way we go on about it that we were the only country on the planet with hospitals, doctors and nurses. Newsflash: we're not.

    The NHS budget for 17/18 is £124bn. You honestly think there's no savings to be found in that gigantic budget?
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 30-05-2017 at 12:02 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  4. #244
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,088
    Tokens
    1,257
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Oop seems the FT got that graph wrong, here's updated with correct figures.



    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  5. #245
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    209
    Tokens
    1,451
    Habbo
    hungryfront

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    Let's hope the historical trend isn't bucked.
    The NHS budget for 17/18 is £124bn. You honestly think there's no savings to be found in that gigantic budget?
    That's £1771.43 per person roughly, and don't forget that has to cover staff, buildings, the actual procedure, ambulances, utilities, food, and more.

    Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
    just here to be political considering there's been a pretty one-sided viewpoint on here for a couple of years x

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    14,107
    Tokens
    4,179

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I go genuinely wonder how much the youth turnout will be this year, will be interesting to see.

    It'd be nice to see voter turnout for all groups increase again
    /

  7. #247
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,088
    Tokens
    1,257
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Andrew Hawkins, the Chaiman of ComRes pollsters, has nailed his firms predictions to the post showing that this election is as much a contest between the pollsters as the political parties. Worth a read, the last ComRes had Conservatives on 46% and Labour 34%.

    Here's an extract from his article regarding age, turnout and his conclusion.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Hawkins, ComRes
    Turnout

    First, turnout. If you ask different demographic groups how likely they are to vote, the answers you get translate into behaviour in different but predictable ways. In other words, when one person says that they are a ten-out-of-ten, rock-solid certainty to vote, that does not necessarily mean the same as when another person of a different age or income group says it. The voter turnout model we developed in the wake of the 2015 General Election, when we were close (but not close enough) to the final result, adjusts for that known, observable discrepancy. We are in a minority among pollsters for doing so.

    This has a direct impact on our published voting intention results. While our turnout model takes account of factors other than age, broadly speaking the Conservatives have a commanding lead among those aged over 45, while Labour is ahead among younger groups. At present, more than 60% of 18-24s say they are ‘absolutely certain’ to vote, yet only 44% did so in 2015. So you can see how easy it might be to exaggerate Labour’s vote share by overstating the propensity of young people to vote – if younger people behave in the same way they did in 2015 and indeed in previous elections. But the last time more than 60% of 18-24s voted was in 1992 – and more than 40% of them in that election voted Conservative.

    Conclusion

    What does all this mean for the current campaign? Very simply, if voters behave in the way they broadly did in 2015, then the Conservatives remain on track for a 100-plus majority. This seems, on present assumptions, the most likely outcome. Older people appear more motivated than younger people to vote, most of UKIP’s 2015 vote is going to the Conservatives (and that Party is not even standing in around half of all constituencies), May beats Corbyn on most ‘best for’ measures, and Labour’s core vote lacks motivation.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 30-05-2017 at 12:42 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  8. #248
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,226
    Tokens
    325
    Habbo
    Zitrone

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Hung Parliament folks!


  9. #249
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    14,107
    Tokens
    4,179

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    That can't be correct, what?!
    /

  10. #250
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    209
    Tokens
    1,451
    Habbo
    hungryfront

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    https://twitter.com/christorwho/stat...13767007539200

    Just dropping that in here.

    Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
    just here to be political considering there's been a pretty one-sided viewpoint on here for a couple of years x

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •