What really happened at the pentagon during 9/11?

[PatrickBuddy]

After further research, I have noticed that the plane would have been TOUCHING the ground in the position it hit.

"A white-hot flash explosion consistent with an exploding
missile warhead and totally inconsistent with an aluminum
jetliner carrying orange-red-burning jet-fuel kerosene hitting
a limestone, brick and concrete office building."

Also, watch the only released video. The security camera.
There seems to be a tail of a plane coming to the pentagon. If you compaire that tail with a boeing 747's you will notice that the 747's is MUCH larger. AND more of the 747 would be visible. There is only a bit covered up by something. In compairison, just enough to cover up a fighter jet.

[NekkLe]

I never realised there was this coincednce? :s

[PatrickBuddy]

Even if this WAS an act of terrorism, why can't we see any of the video tapes? Is there something to hide? Would they still be investigating it? I doubt they would be investigating it. What would the harm be showing the tapes? There has been a lot worse on the news.


Well ok. We can't show a video showing an airplane hitting a building, but we can show our airplanes bombing other countries? Yeah the plane hitting a building would really disturb our youth. Let's keep everybody out of everything and let's not reveal what really happened.


The tape the "plane" - Harmful? Not at all, why not clear everything up with everybody so there are no arguments? Are you trying to hide something from us? I think so

[-Soph-]

i like ur post patrick....very impressive...but ... and its a big but....

that doesnt look much like a boeing 747, I thought they have an upstairs, that looks more like a boring 737...

[NekkLe]

that doesnt look much like a boeing 747, I thought they have an upstairs, that looks more like a boring 737...

Rofl, how can you tell :s you can hardly see any details?

[Yayse]

Well recently, I have been doing some research on 9/11. I have found a neat flash that has to do with the strike on the petagon, it can be viewed at http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Preloader

I watched the video over 25 times, and most of it is starting to sink in. This flash brings forth a lot of evidence about 9/11. If you are too lazy to watch the flash, I shall explain some things.

The wedge of the pentagon that was "hit" by a "boeing 747" has been in renavations since 1999. The wedge must have been pretty much empty, so there would have been minimal casualties. - Terrorists usually go after large targets and try to murder masses....not break some walls and kill a few people.


The rings that were hit have almost PERFECT circles knocked out. There has been no evidence of a plane at all. Planes usually make large messes when they crash. Check other plane accidents. They all mess up the ground, and leave rubble. In the incident with the pentagon, there are only a few metal scraps, no wings, no tail, no plane. The grass in front of the area that was hit is perfect without any marks.


The incident was captured on some video cameras, but the FBI and DoD have taken the films, and have never released them.

Most people claimed to have seen a smaller jet that would hold 8 to 12 people zoom by before the event. Nobody has ever seen the Boeing 747. At the angle that the "plane" hit the pentagon, the pilot would have been flying at over 500 miles per hour, at TWO feet above the ground. The "plane" would have passed over a highway. This seemed to have happened without any reports of blasts of wind. I think a plane going at over 500 miles per hour at two feet above the ground would be noticed?

A pentagon security camera recorded the incident. There was a small blur that did not at all resemble a boeing 747.

Why can't the american government release any of the tapes to show a boeing 747 indeed crash into the pentagon? For some odd reason, air traffic control lost contact with the stolen boeing 747 a long time BEFORE "it" hit the pentagon. Was a boeing 747 ever found? No.

Awesome rep+ this has got me totally spooked ^_^ glad u brought it up

[PatrickBuddy]

After further research, one distinguishable piece of "rubble" was found. A piece from the right side of an aircraft.

Here's the catch. When people looked at the rubble, they noticed it was from the RIGHT side of the aircraft.

The piece of rubble was found where the left side of the "plane" would have been. The rubble was ALSO located a considerable distance away from the "crash". It seems that this "plane" must have been flying backwards, into the pentagon while shedding it's metal.

This piece of "rubble" was found 25 minutes after the crash. Let me remind you, the area was already swarming with FBI and DoD agents. By that time, all the security tapes that would have had this "plane" were taken.

The piece of "rubble" had no burn marks, just dents. Now how easy would a piece like this be to get? Pretty darn easy. - Scrap metal.


There were also some "pieces of the airplane" in the holes and around the "crash" site. These pieces of metal are not distinguishable at any degree. There were also construction sites near the area. These construction sites contained pieces of metal similar or identical to what was found.

Pieces of the "engines" were found. These pieces of "rubble" look pretty old, burnt, and rusty. Now why would a up to date aircraft have old engines? - also, what would have happened to the rest of the plane? The LARGE wings? the LARGE body, the LARGE amount of passengers? All of this seemed to...vanish.


Spectators claim to have seen FBI and DoD agents walking to the site with large crates that had tarp over them. They soon walked away from the site, still with the crates. Then "rubble" started to appear.

[ChloeDust]

Hmm very interesting, you seem to know your stuff +rep

[Ellis.]

i like ur post patrick....very impressive...but ... and its a big but....

Great post Patrick But I do have one question about the airplane being 2 feet from the ground.

If the airplane was really 2 feet off the ground, wouldn't it's shadow (seen on the grass) be closer to the body of the airplane and less noticeable on the grass? If you take a look at the shadow of the pentagon wall, you can see that the shadow is quite near to the object producing it, which in this case is the wall. But if you take a look at the shadow of the airplane, isn't it a little bit far off from the plane to be 2 feet? If the plane was really 2 feet from the ground, shouldn't the shadow be much closer to it than it is in the picture? But who knows, I may be wrong.

Overall, I really think you're a great problem solver. You have many clues to back your statements up and you think before you say. I'd love for you to continue posting these mystery threads, I like to think sometimes You've gotten me stumped about the whole incedent, I just wanted to point that shadow part up though, so yea.

[ssricky]

that doesnt look much like a boeing 747, I thought they have an upstairs, that looks more like a boring 737...

that could have easily been altered by the cia computer nerds :\