Quick Reply or Long Boring Reply?

[ilovejordan]

quick reply

[Adam$]

Quick Reply.

I couldn't be hassled with fonts and all that stuff. And whoever said something about typing in black (I can't be bothered to look up, I'm far too lazy. "/) You can choose the colour in quick reply. ;D

[Demynx]

I never used Quick Reply, only Post reply.

[-Wolverine]

I just use post reply, never once used quick reply

[Uwe]

I ALWAYSuse quick reply, Im using it now

[Billay]

using quick reply now but usually norm.

[FlyingJesus]

Only reason I use a big'un is if I'm quoting and/or ripping someone's post apart.

[Grimmauld]

[ FONT="Palatino Linotype" ] text here[ /FONT ]

Without the spaces - cant do normal as VB sucks and generates BB code in Code blocks... Stupidty incarnate...

Thanks, I think I'll just stick with reply.

[Adam$]

People say they use long reply as they don't have the text options they like in Quick reply, such as colour, quote, and formatting, etc.

Quick Reply allows you to do all of them. Quote someone's message, Format your text in Bold, Italic or even underline. There's a colour-changing tool, a hyperlinking tool, an IMG tool and a quote tool.

You can make the box bigger by the and buttons in the corner.

Quick Reply ftw.

Although I do wish that the WYSIWIG editing was loaded to Quick Reply.

Ahaha, I'm typing this when people could just look down. :rolleyes:

[Herman]

Post Reply, I used to use Quick reply, but I don't anymore.