I'm sick and tired of this...

[Nixt]

I would agree that this infraction was incredibly harsh, we are all entitled to our opinion and if you think the Moderation on this forum isn't great then there shouldn't be a problem with that.

I am under the impression that rules and infractions etc are currently being reviewed, so just stay patient.

[8Freak8]

In the infraction it shows the full PM, which I would say is just enough to warn you.

[Eamonn]

I agree and I hate how they give you profile infractions, I would atleast like to know what I have done to earn the infraction.

[Biseinen]

I'm not complaining about the infraction, just the way I recieved it. I mean, those extra things, Nvr, were completly clean and had no hidden meaning what so ever.

It's not my fault he has such a virgin mind. = /

Oh, and my infraction hasn't been removed because I apparently was being 'Mean'. We're not 5. O_o

[nvrspk4]

Some Mods are OTT! Imo, the site managers and admins should look through what they're doing like!
Also, what does Smiddy actually do as Staff Editor?!?!
People will probably leave if this gets out of hand with the infractions.. I mean, sometimes the spam forums even a place to complain now. But has anyone noticed the name? Spam Ive even seen mods infract someone for double posting in the SPAM forum!
It needs a wee bit sorting..

People do keep overwatch on the mods Also why bring Smiddy into this? What did he do to you? Anyway Staff Editor adds staff permissions and removes them, it was added to his title because managers were confused as who to send it to. Mods infracting for double posting in the spam forum isn't often, and the infraction is always reversed if reported.

I'm not complaining about the infraction, just the way I recieved it. I mean, those extra things, Nvr, were completly clean and had no hidden meaning what so ever.

What do you mean about the way you recieved it? As I agree maybe it shouldn't have been given, maybe just a PM warning. Also, whether you wanted it or not the meaning was there, and it could be misconstrued. For example, if I were to call someone a "stupid gay" which I would never do of course, I would be called homophobic though I could be using it in the other sense. Especially by using the word virgin which does have rude implications you could've insulted them. Once again, it was barely enough for an infraction but given the full PM we don't have enough to reverse it.

It's not my fault he has such a virgin mind. = /

Oh, and my infraction hasn't been removed because I apparently was being 'Mean'. We're not 5. O_o

Erm that's not a valid reason for not reversing it, unless they said something else, so I'll look into it.

[Biseinen]

But, Nvr. If you are usinjg it in the correct way and they miss-interpretate it, then shouldn't look at the context of the way you have said it and what you said along with it?

I wasn't swearing and saying things of a sexual nature and then go on about his virgin mind.

I explained what I meant and how I said it with the other things I said and there was nothing wrong with what I said. If someone has a virgin mind, then they have a virgin mind. They're more sensitive to other peoples ways of saying things.

Not that he has an 'un-sexed mind' Lmao. :p

Edit: Theres things like what you said about saying that "Stupid Gay" or whatever but like I said, you look at the context, how they said it and who they were saying it too. You don't just assume "Right, he said something which I assume is dirty and wrong, I'll infraction him".

It's just not fair.

[---MAD---]

In my other thread, I was very calm and did not rant, just give my opinion on this matter over rules, infractions and other issues on HabboxForum.

This is a rant and I don't care at the moment, I've gone past the point of reason with the Moderators/Super-Moderators here. (Not all of you, some of you are great).

I have just recieved an infraction for 'Insulting a member of staff'. Now, you see this and you're probably thinking, "Damn, he must of said something pretty bad to him/her!" Right?

WRONG

I got an infraction for PMing this to a Moderator: "Haha, [Get's the warning removed]. Typical example of bad moderation."

Now please tell me where I have been excessivly rude, very mean and even vulgar to this person? Hmmm? Cause if you don't know, I'm lose.


If this continues, you will lose members at such a rapid pace and this place will turn into a place where noone want to post and HAVE FUN!


~ Karl (--><--- That close to leaving).

Hey,
I can see why this is annoying. I would be annoyed to however its best not to reply to automated PMs as it just causes trouble. You should forward the pm to one of the forum management (myself, A4Aowen, Ostinato or Seacat) to look into. We can use the database to check the PM you sent to the moderator as well. If you tell us (in the pm) which mod gave you the infraction and if its the same mod that gave you the previous infraction you replied to.

Thanks
MAD

[Processor]

Smae with me all i did was get that green bb satnded for bird bath not bball trouphy and i got an infraction just for sayin i offer for ur bball trouphy a oil lamp im new so how do i know it was that now im not postin as much as i want to :BangHead:

[liquid]

smiddy shouldn't be admin lol.

but on topic!!!!!

yeh some mods are well gay with them, but like, if they're unfair Catszy and people remove them for you so it's like no biggy?!?!?

[superstar911]

smiddy shouldn't be admin lol.

but on topic!!!!!

yeh some mods are well gay with them, but like, if they're unfair Catszy and people remove them for you so it's like no biggy?!?!?

i think he should, hes an amazing guy, i love him just as much as eternalmasque (who should be admin as hes so so awesome)

but you should ease up on infractions, like double posting why infraction for that prehaps if its constant then infraction but for 1 is just pointless