Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


View Poll Results: Should he of been exicuted?

Voters
49. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    25 51.02%
  • No

    24 48.98%
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 63
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    new york.
    Posts
    11,188
    Tokens
    2,270

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    No, he kept Iraq under control and we've ruined it now.
    Thats a reason we shouldnt have hung him? How would it be better if he stayed alive, just curious?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    UK, Reading, Berkshire
    Posts
    2,907
    Tokens
    1,471

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    No he didn't deserve it. Killing is never jutified. Granted he killed people, but not personally. The grusome murders were never carried out by Saddam all the time, the people sent to murder did more grusome kills.

    He should of been left to live and serve the rest of his life in jail. If he did escpae (which is impossible), what would he do? He had nothing left? He was, a broken man. The only reason we went to war was for Weapons of Mass Destructive, which, as usual, America never found (the UK just backed up the US, as usual). They just used the whole idea to find Saddam.

    After Saddam assisinated all thoses people in that village, he was the best PM in Iraq. Iraq was at peace, they were not a thread other than the dumb accusation of Weapons.

    Also, people who are saying he should be tortured in my opinion should be tortured too. In our civilisation, we don't want SICK people who think watching a broken man die is funny should probably be killed too. Just shows to me you're capable of killing if given the chance. Wow, what is the world coming too? People wanting to watch a man get slaughtered, sick.
    I totally agree with you mate no one ever deserves to die I think he would have suffered more in prison
    I’ll be a story in your head, but that’s okay, because we’re all stories in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? Because it was, you know. It was the best. A daft old man who stole a magic box and ran away. Did I ever tell you that I stole it? Well, I borrowed it. I always meant to take it back. Oh, that box, Amy, you’ll dream about that box. It’ll never leave you. Big and little at the same time. Brand-new and ancient and the bluest blue ever. And the times we had, eh? Would had…Never had. In your dreams, they’ll still be there. The Doctor and Amy Pond and the days that never came.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,477
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth View Post
    Well I reckon he could have personally, he is not only a rich but a very influential person. And yeah he could easily go on a killing rampage, he could easily have got many of his followers to killed certain people.

    I agree about it being lose lose, but he's dead now so there's nothing can be brought to get him back - good.
    What are you talking about, influential? Cos hes so gunna influence the security guards to let him out like. You dont know what your tlking about
    COS A SED SO RITE.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RedStratocas View Post
    Thats a reason we shouldnt have hung him? How would it be better if he stayed alive, just curious?
    It's not really about keeping him alive, it is about moral customs and common sense really.

    The war was what started everything, it was a pointless war. Saddam was a good PM until the US made a daft accusation as per usual that he had WOMD which he never had and wasn't expecting to start a war in the West. The US made up that story.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    new york.
    Posts
    11,188
    Tokens
    2,270

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    It's not really about keeping him alive, it is about moral customs and common sense really.

    The war was what started everything, it was a pointless war. Saddam was a good PM until the US made a daft accusation as per usual that he had WOMD which he never had and wasn't expecting to start a war in the West. The US made up that story.
    I dont see why the US's actions make even of his actions? I agree that he controlled the country much better than we could, but now that we invaded and captured him... then what?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well considering they killed him, the group follwoing him are going to be a bit angry so there will probably some more death. I can't see the the allied forces moving out any time soon, unless they really don't care about Iraq and over look the fact that if we left, there would no one to stop more bombs and gun crimes.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,477
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Well considering they killed him, the group follwoing him are going to be a bit angry so there will probably some more death. I can't see the the allied forces moving out any time soon, unless they really don't care about Iraq and over look the fact that if we left, there would no one to stop more bombs and gun crimes.
    he had a right to die, if his followers decide to kill more people, it is there choice, not ours. We cannot control peoples actions, if they decide to kill someone, that is there wrong doing
    COS A SED SO RITE.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    With this theory, you also think Bush and Blair have a right to die. They ordered the war and aren't pulling out, which is actually good because now that they've killed Saddam, there would be alot of things happening for a few weeks.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    334
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    I think even after what he did, he shouldnt have been executed. I dont approve of the death penalty, and i dont think that anyone deserves it.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,477
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Why should we live in a world of worry? Bush And Blairs actions to help iraq become more stable in this world have backfired in some aspects, but they are only try to protect the other survillions on this planet. If they didnt step in, im sure Sadam would have ordered many more wars than what we are seeing today.
    COS A SED SO RITE.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •