I am a conspircist but I rekon 9/11 was terrorists![]()

I am a conspircist but I rekon 9/11 was terrorists![]()
MFC Results
Home Vs Blackburn: 1-2 (Downing)
Away Vs Wigan: 0-1
Away Vs Fulham: 2-1 (Mido and Cattermole)
Home Vs Newcastle: 2-2 (Mido and Arca)
Next match
Home vs Northampton
Her face just makes my day
Just Saying.My dad Died In That Tower Who Was Colapsing
So If U Don't Mind....
Latest - Rep; UnknownLatest + Rep; HitmanBack on Habbo UK!Part of BullyBusters UK!Part of the Welcoming group!:8Looking for Rep ppl..Everytime you change your name, God kills a kitten.
737 757 767 777
A330 A300 A310 A306 A200 all have 1 on each side = 2
It deosn't mttaer waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a tatol mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm.
T-Mobile G1!!!
All I can think of is that it gave Bush a reason for an Agressive foreign policy which would either result in them producing new technology for the war effort or a windfall of oil. It also resulted in tighter security and control over the American people, maybe Bush or some higher Echelons wanted that for some reason (This is where you delve into the wholel NWO conspiricies and stuff).
Not really, because most of our agressiveness has been targeted in Iraq, and none of the hijackers were from Iraq. So if they made it up, they would say they were all from Iraq.
And simple logic proves the theory wrong anyway. You dont even need facts:
1) Why arent the conspirists all dead? If the government has no problem killing 3000 people, they sure wouldnt have trouble killing a few people to stop the word from spreading.
2) Why would they say the terrorists were from Afghanistan if we wanted to invade Iraq?
3) How could the Bush administration, in all it's glorious stupidity, plan this attack with such 'military precision', but the war in Iraq is a huge disaster?
Aha.
Not really, because most of our agressiveness has been targeted in Iraq, and none of the hijackers were from Iraq. So if they made it up, they would say they were all from Iraq.
And simple logic proves the theory wrong anyway. You dont even need facts:
1) Why arent the conspirists all dead? If the government has no problem killing 3000 people, they sure wouldnt have trouble killing a few people to stop the word from spreading.
2) Why would they say the terrorists were from Afghanistan if we wanted to invade Iraq?
3) How could the Bush administration, in all it's glorious stupidity, plan this attack with such 'military precision', but the war in Iraq is a huge disaster?
The war in Afghanistan was to start this whole war on Terror. By showing how much of a threat terrorism supposedly is, people would be more likely to support a war with a country the Government is claiming to be a bigger threat.
A whole war campaign is harder to plan out than an individual strike. The coalition managed to sweep through Iraq in a few weeks with very little losses. In that sense it was extremely successful, but the insurgancy that followed most probably wasn't predicted in such force as it should of been demolished in Afghanistan.
The Government can't really just pop off conpiricy theorists or whole teams because it becomes suspicious.
Then again. I do believe terrorists brought down the Twin Towers and that the war in Iraq was just an open opportunity.
Latest - Rep; UnknownLatest + Rep; HitmanBack on Habbo UK!Part of BullyBusters UK!Part of the Welcoming group!:8Looking for Rep ppl..Everytime you change your name, God kills a kitten.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!