
It should be changed really;
"America are the causes of what could turn out to be, world war 3".
Like I said, it was last night and quick so no research nor checks![]()
my speech is on america, and they're annoying tactics to try and 'control the world'.
i believe that america are the causes of world war 3, not iraq or afghanistan. i believe that the evil dictator, sadam, was wrong to do what he did, but what was also wrong is america trying to go in and solve it. i believe that iraq didn't ask for help from america so why should they butt in and do whatever they like? i know why, because they are power-mad and will do anything that involves guns and war.
There is no WW3They may be quite power-mad, but however you do mention we ruled a large amount of the world. We acted similarly
![]()
another thing that ticks me off is how britain joins in and does whatever america does. i mean; we're an independant nation[s] and we should make our own decisions without america telling us what to do. remember, we once 'controlled' america as the british empire so if anything, shouldn't it be the other way around? i guess not.
America do influence us. However, hopefully that will change. Tbf, the EU has too much influence
america claim they went into iraq and afghanistan to "fight the war on terror" and to "find weapons of mass destruction". i believe the only weapon of mass destruction is america, and the only terror to come from all this is the terror that the family's of the dead that they have to face on a daily basis because america decided to go to war.
America were acting largely in retalliation to the murder of thousands. You can understand their position in this.
i believe the real reason why america went to war with the countries is not to restore peace, but to use their power to get the oil that is found in the middle-east. sure enough, they never found any "weapons of mass destruction" as it was just an allaby for america to invade.
Everywhere wants and needs oil. This has been a problem for years. Many of these countries fight amongst themselves for oil. I fair agree with you there.
nuclear weapons is another thing about america. they say that they're allowed them but other countries aren't incase they do something dangerous with them, ha, the only dangerous thing around here is america. russia, korea - they have nuclear missiles and are, rightly so, not getting rid of them until america does so.
Again, your quite right. Double standards. Who decides whos allowed nuclear weapons? Although, who would you consider a more stable nation. America, or North Korea?
i don't know about the american dream, but i do know about the american nightmare. the nightmare that iraqi citizens face on a daily basis. the nightmare that the family's of dead have to face on a daily basis.
Personally, I think the American's (largely) are trying to help the Iraqi's.
global warming? hardly. there's nothing warm, nothing humble about the world we live in today, nothing at all.
Can't really comment on thatThe equator is fairly warm though
I'm bored incase you haven't noticed![]()
I like that, +rep.
There is no WW3They may be quite power-mad, but however you do mention we ruled a large amount of the world. We acted similarly
![]()
Read above post.
Thing is, we did rule a large amount of the world.. America don't and therefore shouldn't act as if they do really.
America do influence us. However, hopefully that will change. Tbf, the EU has too much influence
I hate the EU, and maybe Brown will have sense and withdraw our troops.
America were acting largely in retalliation to the murder of thousands. You can understand their position in this.
I can understand why they wanted to do it, I just feel they should've left them to deal with it themselves, after all they are an independent nation and should only have help when they ask for it themselves.
Everywhere wants and needs oil. This has been a problem for years. Many of these countries fight amongst themselves for oil. I fair agree with you there.
10-20 years and we're doomed, in big crap.
Again, your quite right. Double standards. Who decides whos allowed nuclear weapons? Although, who would you consider a more stable nation. America, or North Korea?
America is stable, but they're using nuclear missiles as a threat.
Personally, I think the American's (largely) are trying to help the Iraqi's.
Yes, they are trying to help but many innocent civilians have been killed en route to helping Iraq.
Can't really comment on thatThe equator is fairly warm though
Haha, I meant that warm fuzzy feeling![]()
Sadly, it's true, even though most people in this country don't want to be involved at all in world affairs anymore...
Former Competitions Manager & International Division Manager
Former Moderator, HxHD Staff, HabboxFriends Staff, International Super Moderator
Okay, I believe that America went to fight against the middle-east to defend themselves && get what they wanted. After 9/11 attacks, yes, it was a bad idea to go && fight but also, a good idea. If they hadn't attacked, more terrorist attacks could've been caused because the middle-east will believe that America won't do anything to protect themselves. Also, causing harm to their country. But then it makes the problem A LOT bigger. If they had, as they did, go && attack the middle-east, they show the middle-east who's boss. They went in for what they wanted && to stop the middle-east from attacking their country && it worked but caused other countries to get involved && caused problems where they are.
I think that America did what they had to do.
Last edited by lAdmire; 30-06-2007 at 06:25 PM.
Mya Celeste B.
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 | 900 | 1000 |