Sponging people.

[Jord]

if you trace time back nobody who is here now was originally from england. saxons, romans, normans, vikings. none of them are english.

Thats what I was going to say

[luke-p]

[quote=NaughtyNemo;3731235]What else they gonna spend "your" money on? you see that thread with the £100mill mosque or however much it costed?quote]

Education, NHS, transport... I feel they could be greatly improved expecialy the NHS... Maybe they could put more medications on the NHS Like all them 'Life saving drugs they refuse to give' what is in the newspapers from time to time.

[Virgin Mary]

If you trace back time far enough, no one is from any country except East Africa. The fact is that we, as descendants of Saxons, Romans etc., are the English, because that is what we've come to be known as.

[FlyingJesus]

In case anyone's interested in what the original post was talking about and not just the interpretation of it that people seem to have come up with, he raises a valid (although much used, and therefore not that important) point. He didn't say we should get rid of all foreigners, just that we should stop accepting asylum seekers who have no desire to work.
A better solution in my opinion would be that asylum seekers should only be allowed in for a certain amount of time, and during that time they must find and keep a stable job, or else move back out of the country. This way the honest ones can stay in a country which they want to be in, and the "sponges" don't affect us for long.

[Nemo]

In case anyone's interested in what the original post was talking about and not just the interpretation of it that people seem to have come up with, he raises a valid (although much used, and therefore not that important) point. He didn't say we should get rid of all foreigners, just that we should stop accepting asylum seekers who have no desire to work.
A better solution in my opinion would be that asylum seekers should only be allowed in for a certain amount of time, and during that time they must find and keep a stable job, or else move back out of the country. This way the honest ones can stay in a country which they want to be in, and the "sponges" don't affect us for long.

That i agree with, keep the 1s who will actually help and get rid of the ppl who just want something for nothing.

[Alkaz]

In case anyone's interested in what the original post was talking about and not just the interpretation of it that people seem to have come up with, he raises a valid (although much used, and therefore not that important) point. He didn't say we should get rid of all foreigners, just that we should stop accepting asylum seekers who have no desire to work.
A better solution in my opinion would be that asylum seekers should only be allowed in for a certain amount of time, and during that time they must find and keep a stable job, or else move back out of the country. This way the honest ones can stay in a country which they want to be in, and the "sponges" don't affect us for long.

I Can agree with that too. But all the asylum seekers travel through different countrys to get to england and the lawsays w.e country they first land in they have to claim asylum their. But no we turn a blind eye, let them in n let them earn their money which is normaly going on the doll. And we let them send most of their money back to their familys. In like 99% of all other countrys you can only send like 25% of your earnings each month.

omgness the government need to sort it out, send the asylum seekers back. Everyone can say were racist but they shouldnt be here anyway so tbh why should they care?

[ShaneIsMe]

you aren't the third most powerful country.

[Alkaz]

W.e i said meant richest.

[Jazza]

Thread bump much?

[velocity]

My uncle rents a house to an asylum, they came frm africa, they can speak french n went to france n sneaker under a truck or on a ferry or sommitn then came to england found a low paing job lke £3 an hour but thats alot in there currency

its illegal to be paid that low.