I enjoyed watching Zim beat the Aussies. Poetry in motion
I enjoyed watching Zim beat the Aussies. Poetry in motion
Used to be GraysAthChaz
They should have 3 groups with 4 teams in each because with 3 teams in each group and 2 going through, you lose 2 games and you're out
It would be better if they had 3 groups with 4 teams and two from each group qualify, then a knock-out round, then a 3 team group stage each playing each other 2 times whoever wins the group wins the cup
Last edited by Geraint; 13-09-2007 at 10:10 PM.
.
or y'know, a 4 group 4 team system like the normal world cup. makes no sense that Ireland aren't there even though they're higher in the ODI rankings then Kenya!
You french fried when you should have pizza'd. If you french fry when you should pizza, you're gonna have a bad time....
GREAT BANTER
The Twenty20 is different to one-dayers so there might be a different ranking system because Australia don't seem very good this form of the game
.
I dont like the England players. They are morons and childish.
Anyway, world rankings should never be used to determine how good a team is in my opinion.
You could get a team, which looses every game they play. Meaning they will be the lowest in the rankings.
Suppose you get rid of all the players and get new players (or some new players). You start winning all the games since then.
Suppose you lost 100 games with the old team, and with the new team, you won 10 - your ranking will still be low.
Dunno if anyone undestood the above.
Anyway, if England looses against Aussies. they might still get knocked out
Damn the rain today. India couldnt play. They needed a warm up type of match. I think India will loose to Pakistan tomorrow. The Indian team selected for Twenty20 are crap.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!