looks or personality?

[Frodo13.]

50/50.
I wouldn't go out with the hottest girl in the world if she was a complete sket imo.

[beth]

depends what i'm after. aha.
if i just want some fun, it's like looks because i don't want to discuss **** with them.
if i actually want something long-term, i usually date people i've known for a while, so personality mainly and then looks.

but, tbh, if they're completely repulsive i wouldn't go there. even if they were lovely.

[FlyingJesus]

Looks much more. Personality is a bonus.

This has been asked thousands of times before and so I'm going to say the same thing that I always say about it:

Good looking/good personality - excellent, long term material
Good looking/poor personality - a good night
Ugly/good personality - a friend
Ugly/poor personality - get it away from me

If there's no physical attraction it's hardly gonna work.

[JackHb]

Well it starts off with looks, as when I see someone in like a club you will look at them and find them attractive and then you get to know them and find out if you like there personality or not.

[Ramones]

neither, i like to go by wingspan

[-Xiangu-]

best of both tbh thats summing it up

[Ugawa]

a person with a personality is da best

X

[5,5]

Both cuase I could'nt be attracted to someone if they looked like an ape. But if they had no personality they'd be too boring.

[cocaine]

you dont really wanna know someone unless they're good looking lmao.

[Energizer]

personality mainly but obv. you don't wanna be with a dog. so both rly.