uber phail

As long as it's as good as COD4 (probably unlikely) I'll buy it, becasue I still like World War II shooters. The whole thing fascinates me.
Also known as that charming, handsome, young fellow SHEEPY.
i loved cod3!
AshleyPAFC
*Image Removed*
*Image Removed*
Signature edited by Agesilaus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have signature images that go over the size allowed for your usergroup.
While everyone seems to be oohing and aahing at the upcoming Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, it seems that Infinity Ward may not be developing Call of Duty 5. Don’t fret just yet though, as they’ll most likely be back for CoD6. Awhile back, publisher Activision decided they wanted to have a new Call of Duty game out every year, which didn’t leave enough time for Infinity Ward to create the games they wanted to. So a compromise was made after CoD2: Infinity Ward would get two years to make another title, and the franchise would be handled by developer Treyarch in the interim. This explains why CoD3 may have seemed quite a bit different from CoD2. It hasn’t been confirmed, but it seems that this deal may carry over into the next game as well. During that time though, Infinity Ward will also be doling out new downloadable content (maps, weapons, perks, etc.) for CoD4.
This sounds like a pretty good compromise to me, since it keeps both the publisher and the developers happy. I figure a great Call of Duty game every two years is better than a so-so one every year.
Source:
http://news.filefront.com/infinity-w...all-of-duty-5/
AshleyPAFC
*Image Removed*
*Image Removed*
Signature edited by Agesilaus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have signature images that go over the size allowed for your usergroup.
Confirms Treyarch are developing it, I think that's solid proof?While everyone seems to be oohing and aahing at the upcoming Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, it seems that Infinity Ward may not be developing Call of Duty 5. Don’t fret just yet though, as they’ll most likely be back for CoD6. Awhile back, publisher Activision decided they wanted to have a new Call of Duty game out every year, which didn’t leave enough time for Infinity Ward to create the games they wanted to. So a compromise was made after CoD2: Infinity Ward would get two years to make another title, and the franchise would be handled by developer Treyarch in the interim. This explains why CoD3 may have seemed quite a bit different from CoD2. It hasn’t been confirmed, but it seems that this deal may carry over into the next game as well. During that time though, Infinity Ward will also be doling out new downloadable content (maps, weapons, perks, etc.) for CoD4.
This sounds like a pretty good compromise to me, since it keeps both the publisher and the developers happy. I figure a great Call of Duty game every two years is better than a so-so one every year.
Source:
http://news.filefront.com/infinity-w...all-of-duty-5/
Downloadable Content looks gewd
+REP
It should be something like what WWIII would be like, or as Aflux said, Iraqq/Afghanistan would be fun too.
Either way I'll proabbly end up getting it.
I've always thought a WWI game would be interesting. You know, in the trenches, with much of the game depending on tactics.
But COD5 better not be WWII. I'm very sick and tired of it now.
COD4 didn't really have a setting, it was just present day, so why wouldnt COD5 be too?
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!