Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Human Testing?!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    ═╬═
    Posts
    7,060
    Tokens
    182

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    So you'd rather 1000 people died from an un-tested drug than 5 people who agreed and have full knowledge of what might happen instead?

    mmm...
    Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,917
    Tokens
    4,115

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I would rather everything tested on animals than humans. Though it puts me off when it says "Tested on animals" on my condoms.
    Sammeth.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,178
    Tokens
    25

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    Because animals are worthless and don't go aww but it's not fair because it is. If we didn't breed these animals for testing they would all have to be put down.
    Just answered yourself there havent you.
    If we didnt breed them they would be put down.
    So lets not breed them!
    propper need a good sig:\

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    3,547
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I don't feel sorry for the sob stories of people who are rendered infertile because they let themselves be tested on. Why do they think they're being tested on? You may as well jump off a cliff to see what happens...
    Quote Originally Posted by Corporal
    Just answered yourself there havent you.
    If we didnt breed them they would be put down.
    So lets not breed them!
    You could just use social idiots. They're being bred at a proportionately large rate anyway.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA / Arizona
    Posts
    477
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Test on animals first. Then, give the person their choice. If something goes wrong, it's their idiocy, not the company. Sure, it seems wrong, but hey; if they don't do it, who will?

    I don't know. It's hard to say, really. Without all these tests, such as on animals and people, where else could we go? It's our sick way of practicing medicine, and it's sad to say that it's rather mandatory. Unless you'd prefer some untested products zooming directly out of the worlds pharmacies?

    Someone's got to take the load.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,178
    Tokens
    25

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I dont get how you can saw its bad to do it on animals, but then its ok for humans?:s
    Hell why dont we just breed humans and test on them like we animals?
    If they are brought up like them there isnt out wrong with it is there?
    propper need a good sig:\

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    3,547
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I stand by the opinion that it should be done to people on death row. It's a bit contradictory to refuse to test it on humans because it'd taint their quality of life or kill them but then go and execute them anyway.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,726
    Tokens
    14,846

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Animals dont have a choice, humans do and if they want to do it then they can, if they die or get severe side affects they knew about it. The animals dont.


  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammeth. View Post
    it puts me off when it says "Tested on animals" on my condoms.
    Hey I needed the money ok, don't hate

    Quote Originally Posted by Corporal View Post
    Hell why dont we just breed humans and test on them like we animals?
    If they are brought up like them there isnt out wrong with it is there?
    If it was possible to do so without getting human rights issues (which obviously there would be) then I'd agree, I have nothing against the idea of breeding subclasses of humans just for testing. As it is though, animals are the way to go.
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,178
    Tokens
    25

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    Hey I needed the money ok, don't hate



    If it was possible to do so without getting human rights issues (which obviously there would be) then I'd agree, I have nothing against the idea of breeding subclasses of humans just for testing. As it is though, animals are the way to go.
    So why cant there be laws for animals as there is humans?
    After all we are all ment to treat everything the same.
    propper need a good sig:\

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •