Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    529
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    In my opinion Web 2.0 is centred around a number of things. This can include, but not limited to, interactivity, user centred websites, social networking, accessability etc. It also covers new technologies, but that is used in all "Web 2.0" type applications. Another thing about Web 2.0 is that it is aimed to make web applications more like desktop applications.
    Bearing in mind that Web 2.0 is just a phrase coined by O'Reilly Media, similar to AJAX.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    474
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    indeed agreed with above
    Web 2.0 isnt based on designs
    or it would be simple and few sites have 2.0
    the "Design Side" of Web 2.0
    Consists of Complex Backgrounds oringinal art
    extremly complex font like Habbo Snowstorm Font
    and layout sharpening
    easily done

    as above has said people want interactivity
    alot of fansites put the content infront and say do whatever
    interactivity would be navigations like clubhabbo or navigations that hover and come out
    or such as flash & java apps

    basically web 2.0 seems to be based on oringinality and complex
    rarely done coding & Designs
    Post Meter
    ______________________________________________
    400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900-1k
    Green=Done | Orange=Almost | Red=Not Done
    ______________________________________________
    Habbo fury Coming Soon!
    My Img tag has ran away

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    On Earth
    Posts
    1,373
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aflux View Post
    It's turned into a style by morons who thought; "I know, lets put a shadow on this and reduce the opacity to 20% - LOLMGZ! WEB2.0!".

    It's merely the 'Internet Revolution' which involves using new technology [xhtml/css/php etc] as opposed to the old plain HTML.

    It is in NO WAY a design style.
    ^^ haha, i dread to think what web 3.0 would be

    opacity to 20.1% and outer glow to 0.001% WEB 3.0


    Tbh .net is good but you dont HAVE to read it to be a good web devloper, just gives you a boost i surpose.
    Posts merged by jesus
    where!

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,691
    Tokens
    1,025

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Web 3.0 is meant to be the development and destroying on Microsoft. Where Google and Apple Inc. are developing software so it is all online. Things like word processing, spreadsheets and so on can be created and saved online.

    That's the prediction in my special edition Webdesigner mag.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Hobart, Australia
    Posts
    593
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Agreed RE definition of Web 3.0. Companies like Adobe are also moving toward that sort of web standard, with development of web versions of Photoshop.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •