Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Rambo

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hackney
    Posts
    14,850
    Tokens
    1,816

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misawa View Post
    Rambo: written and directed by Sylvester Stallone
    Certificate: 18
    Running time: 90 minutes.

    Saying that Sylvester Stallone's Rambo is a violent film would be an understatement. "Unexpectedly and incredibly violent" would be a more fitting term to describe it.

    The storyline is deliberately basic and not meant to unfold. It is merely created to give a platform to the really concentrated area of the film - the carnage. First Blood Part IV is not for those who explicitly enjoy motion pictures with deep, serious premises, it was created purely for the hardcore fans of non-stop, thrilling action, and boy, does it deliver.

    From decapitations, exploding bodies, corpses being eaten by pigs, and raped and bayonetted children, the film pushes the majority of entertainment taboos, but gets away with a fantastic thrill-ride of over-the-top gore and complete chaos.

    The storyline of Rambo is that Sylvester Stallone's character, John Rambo, sets out on a mission to rescue a group of Christian Aid workers, who he briefly became aquainted with, from pirates in Burma. Tagging along with Sly are a group of mercenaries, including the cliche arrogant Brit who we hate, but eventually love as the film draws to a close.

    The cinematography is not well devised thanks to the lack of lengthy and workable shots. Only the opening 30 minutes of the film contribute to the storyline, the following hour is all blood-stained destruction. The camerawork is shakey to match the ever-frantic pace of the film, and sometimes distorted, including a plethora of fast cuts, which at times are actually rather disorientating, and make you mentally re-run some of the scenes so that you can divulge what exactly they contained.

    Fans of the previous three films in the First Blood saga will be pleased to know that his infamous bow makes a comeback.

    This film is deserving of high praise not because it is something up there with recent instant classics such as the Coen brothers' No Country For Old Men, but for the fact that it completely delivers a perfect product to its desired audience - bloodthirsty action fans. You will not be disappointed if you fall into this generic pool. If you don't catch it in the cinema, it is a DVD must have for the collection of all those who love such depicted death and destruction.

    So, grab a Coke, a bag of popcorn, a strong stomach, and a guilty pleasure for the word C U Next Tuesday. You're in for something wild with Rambo.

    Misawa's rating: 8/10.
    I would rate all 3 10/10 but thats just me


  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    273
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jord View Post
    I would rate all 3 10/10 but thats just me
    There's 4 of them now.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    herne bay
    Posts
    11,625
    Tokens
    1,023

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    i think this one is the best.
    the first i thought was a stupid idea, and the second i wasnt too fond of either. the third was the first one i saw, and i enjoyed it. but it just doesnt compare with rambo 4.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,029
    Tokens
    75

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I was quite dissapointed when I watched this, there isn't much of a storyline it's just kill after kill

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    manchester
    Posts
    77
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    i thought it was a good film, not much of a storyline but still exciting.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    273
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    It was meant to be pure killing carnage, after recentely watching it.
    Wow.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,049
    Tokens
    1,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhythmGFX View Post
    i thought it was a good film, not much of a storyline but still exciting.
    It wasn't meant to have a strong storyline, Stallone deliberately wanted to produce a non-stop thrilling film for hardcore action fans, e.g. Rambo fans basically.

    Rambo: First Blood Part 3 is dire. In order of greatness, personally, it goes First Blood, Rambo, Rambo: First Blood Part 2, and finally Rambo: First Blood Part 3.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •