Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: £800 Desktop

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Peterborough, UK
    Posts
    3,855
    Tokens
    216

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tawm View Post
    Vista Home Premium x64 has no problems for me.

    XP x64 was so crap it should never have been released.
    XP x64 Pro is ok, cause it's built on win server 2k3


    visit my internet web site on the internet
    http://dong.engineer/
    it is just videos by bill wurtz videos you have been warned

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    4,918
    Tokens
    126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J1MI View Post
    Currently:
    Intel CPU Core 2 Quad Q9300Quad Core 2.5GHz 1333FSB LGA775 6MB cache - 172.71 - CPUIP4775Q9300
    Gigabyte motherboard GA X48-DS4 LGA775 Intel X48 1600 FSB DDR2 ATX - 139.59 - MOTGIGX48DS4
    Corsair 4096MB TwinX XMS2 8500C5 DDR2 5-5-5-15 1066Mhz Memory Kit - 81.71 - MEMCORTX485DF
    BFG GTX 260 OC 896MBGraphics Card DDR3 PCI-E Dual DVI - 264.96 - VIDBFGGTX260OC
    DVD-RW - Current
    PSU - Current
    HDD's - Current
    Vista :s

    Need a case some fans and a CPU heatsink.
    The changes you've made are better components, but slightly less value for money. Judt to confirm, is the RAM you've put down this? http://www.microdirect.co.uk/(37333)...DR2-55515.aspx If it is then good and if it's not which is it?

    Depending on which case you go for it may come with plenty of fans or it may need a few more. Depending on whether the CPU you buy is retail packaged or OEM packaged it will come with the stock Intel HSF or not. It's uup to you if you want to use a different cooler than the stock if it comes with stock.

    According to one of Stephen's posts "Actually, they overclock brilliantly, but they don't last near as long. On the overclocking forum I use people have killed their new 45nm quad cores within months with only a moderate overclock. I'd steer clear of them" it may sway you decision on whether you want one of the new generation quads and whether you want to overclock etc.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Lichfield
    Posts
    4,302
    Tokens
    1,877

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Scrap the GTX 260. ATI's new cards (4870 and the 4870X2) are really going to pwn.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    4,918
    Tokens
    126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
    Scrap the GTX 260. ATI's new cards (4870 and the 4870X2) are really going to pwn.
    I read somewhere that they're not going to meet the performance of the nVidia 200 series, but will be better value for money.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Lichfield
    Posts
    4,302
    Tokens
    1,877

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well, the 4870 is going to beat the 9800GTX+ at a cheaper price, and the 4870X2 beats the GTX280 at a cheaper price.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    4,918
    Tokens
    126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
    Well, the 4870 is going to beat the 9800GTX+ at a cheaper price, and the 4870X2 beats the GTX280 at a cheaper price.
    Ok fair enough then. How'd you know this?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Lichfield
    Posts
    4,302
    Tokens
    1,877

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well we don't know it yet as a fact, but i'm hoping. Nvidia should be put in their place for charging over £500 for a graphics card. To be beaten by a £300 card, it will be a deadly blow.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •