How come

[AgnesIO]

I've never been temp banned, and I used to getting in a arguement daily...

I havent had a warning in months now, but tbh its only when new mods come in, that you get warning's and infractions, but even then they get used to the power after a week.

If they gave warnings for b asically everything believe me I would not be here, and I am sure nvr, jesus, hitman, and MAD could probably agree that I often do get in trouble

[Nemo]

If you're having a discussion with the intention to "outsmart" management then you're going about it the wrong way. Outsmarting someone doesn't achieve anything except a vague sense of smugness. You can try and persuade management, you'll find we don't have a problem with that, but trying to outsmart is only going to make us annoyed, and annoyed people and ban buttons generally get on pretty well



Very true, notice how I didn't mention that first time round You've been good recently though, obviously our whips are leathery enough.

Simple enough, its not what you say, its how you say it. And the part in bold made me laff.



I object to this on two fronts. One I have an ego and I don't believe you were outsmarting us, I posted a long big reply but the forum died on me and I was way too lazy to rewrite it (did Gomme forward you that PM?)

Secondly, as Alex said your aim was apparently to be negative and outsmart and one-up the management, which is not a positive addition to the forum. Your focus was not improving the forum but instead proving the management wrong. There are ways to say things

Ill answer them both at once. Perhaps outsmart was the wrong word to use, but i meant like, prove my side of the arguement.

oh, and gomme didnt forward me it.

[today]

I've seen pretty strongly opinionated posts from both of the above but they're both still here. Jord got it pretty much spot on; there's a difference between disagreeing and insulting, and the line isn't as fine as some people make it out to be.

But im not nearly here!!