Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49
  1. #21
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,197
    Tokens
    418
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    If the Government want to sort out the youth, instead of targeting the majority with these sorts of schemes, how about target the minority who cause damage, who use violence and so on. The reason why? - because they can't they are pushovers. Yet again Labour talk tough/punish a specfic part of society.

    Just like they target motorists with taxes, well the list just continues with this government and the sooner it is gone the better, only less than one year of it left and thank god.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    ═╬═
    Posts
    7,060
    Tokens
    182

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Isn't this the exact same plan Obama announced a few weeks ago?
    Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    The flaw is that the kids who are the problem in society will refuse to do it, and that means your just punishing the good kids. Don't worry anyway, New Labour will be out of office in 2010.
    I'd like to agree with you there but this is yet another of example parliament just over-ruling Under 18s. Under 18s don't get their opinions heard or anything, since they can't vote the government aren't interested and can do what they like to Under 18s since it's not like we're going to vote them out?

    They can continue to treat us like **** and get away with it, the Lib Dems are the only party remotely concerned about Under 18s. Fair enough 18 and 19 year olds can vote but they're hardly enough to make any difference on an elections outcome.

    This seems to me like a very half-hearted attempt to bring back National Service as there was calls for it a little while back. The only way to sort out the youth problem is to bring back proper National Service for everyone or just for people with criminal records.

    And yeah I agree, where's the 'Voluntary'?
    Last edited by Jordy; 12-04-2009 at 02:01 PM.

  4. #24
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,197
    Tokens
    418
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    back proper National Service for everyone or just for people with criminal records.
    That is exactly what I believe in, you've hit the nail on the head of what needs to be done.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Plank View Post
    Yeah, but paying taxes and working doesn't exactly bring the community together. Childhood should be spent doing things what kids do - after all, they will have to work and pay taxes when they are older. It's not really out of 19 years either, because there are only a few years at the end of this period when youngsters are probably able to do it. I mean, forcing a bunch of chavs to work in a charity shop or sweep the streets - I can't imagine it going down lightly, or even benefiting the community.

    Some people may support the idea and think it is brilliant - fair enough, go out and do some voluntary work then. But those that don't want to do it shouldn't have to.
    Working and paying taxes kinda allows there to be a community in the first place..
    I agree that kids should be allowed to be kids and I don't think anyone disputes that, but seriously 50 hours is nothing at all, and if it's done through schools I'm sure it'll be easy enough to moderate - these people are trained to sort young people out after all. As for "if you don't want to you shouldn't have to", it's becoming curriculum which means it's just like any other school activity. I'd like to assume that you don't think school itself should be optional, and this won't be any different to taking other lessons once it's integrated.

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    If the Government want to sort out the youth, instead of targeting the majority with these sorts of schemes, how about target the minority who cause damage, who use violence and so on. The reason why? - because they can't they are pushovers. Yet again Labour talk tough/punish a specfic part of society.
    There's going to be a reward system put in place for it (based on how many hours people do in the end) which will help young people get a head start in the workplace by having proved that they can actually do a job that's required of them. This is not and never has been a punishment scheme
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,424
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    I'd like to agree with you there but this is yet another of example parliament just over-ruling Under 18s. Under 18s don't get their opinions heard or anything, since they can't vote the government aren't interested and can do what they like to Under 18s since it's not like we're going to vote them out?

    They can continue to treat us like **** and get away with it, the Lib Dems are the only party remotely concerned about Under 18s. Fair enough 18 and 19 year olds can vote but they're hardly enough to make any difference on an elections outcome.

    This seems to me like a very half-hearted attempt to bring back National Service as there was calls for it a little while back. The only way to sort out the youth problem is to bring back proper National Service for everyone or just for people with criminal records.

    And yeah I agree, where's the 'Voluntary'?
    I agree with you. It is very easy to dictate what other people should do, especially young people; but turn the idea around onto them and it's a completely different story. Do you think Gordon Brown would use some of his spare time, perhaps a couple of hours a week, working in a charity shop or sweeping the road?

    Maybe instead of forcing everyone to do community service, those that break the law (criminals) should be forced to do more hours serving the community.

    Maybe we will have the Gordon Youth one day in the future.
    Last edited by Plank; 12-04-2009 at 02:08 PM.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,904
    Tokens
    197

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Work experience for two weeks I would have done more than 50 hours, so I'm not bothered.
    That's why we seize the moment, try to freeze it and own it, squeeze it and hold it cause we consider these minutes golden.


  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,424
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    Working and paying taxes kinda allows there to be a community in the first place..
    I agree that kids should be allowed to be kids and I don't think anyone disputes that, but seriously 50 hours is nothing at all, and if it's done through schools I'm sure it'll be easy enough to moderate - these people are trained to sort young people out after all. As for "if you don't want to you shouldn't have to", it's becoming curriculum which means it's just like any other school activity. I'd like to assume that you don't think school itself should be optional, and this won't be any different to taking other lessons once it's integrated.
    Education/school and community service are completely different things. Hence why one is used as a punishment and the other one isn't. Being forced to do work for the community when you don't want to be there isn't going to give teenagers much of an experience or help them at all - it will probably drive them away from that sort of thing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Skepta View Post
    Work experience for two weeks I would have done more than 50 hours, so I'm not bothered.
    Community service would be nothing like work experience. It's something that is used to punish criminals... so it's not exactly going to be fun is it?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,904
    Tokens
    197

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It's still helping the community out really if you're working with a big company or whatever, and if they want us to stay into schooling/training till we're 18 instead of 16 I'll be finished school by then, and my job would require me to be doing training, so it's ideal.
    That's why we seize the moment, try to freeze it and own it, squeeze it and hold it cause we consider these minutes golden.


  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,650
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Personally I think people of school age already have enough to do. You go to school for like, 6+ hours a day then have homework and revision etc.

    But also 50 hours is not really that long once its spread out and you never know, most people might enjoy doing the voluntary work.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •