WHY WAS MY THREAD DELETED.

[Catzsy]

They are all suitable questions to ask, such as would their cockerel fit in?

In the interests of fairness nvr has also been asked to review this as well so you should receive an answer as soon as he has time to deal with it. Thanks.

[Mentor]

With a link and warning i dont really think it was anything that shouldnt be posted. True it was basically one large inuendo, but i've seen worse the hoobs, rainbow, teletubbys and animanicac's all of which are aimed at an audience younger than the forums "/
Inuendo is only graphic to those who's minds are dirty enough to read between the lines, its only there if your looking for it. If someone didnt understand the comcepts and would be scared, offended or worried by it, in all likely hood they would not have noticed the jokes at all "/

I'm not really sure on what guidelines are used by the mod's these days, but in some areas such as this i do think there should be some revisions. It would be interested to see the guidelines publicly published to so the community can provide some feedback

- posted in wrong thread first time around-

[GordonBanks]

i want all of the rules reviewing not just my infraction :rolleys:

[Catzsy]

With a link and warning i dont really think it was anything that shouldnt be posted. True it was basically one large inuendo, but i've seen worse the hoobs, rainbow, teletubbys and animanicac's all of which are aimed at an audience younger than the forums "/
Inuendo is only graphic to those who's minds are dirty enough to read between the lines, its only there if your looking for it. If someone didnt understand the comcepts and would be scared, offended or worried by it, in all likely hood they would not have noticed the jokes at all "/

I'm not really sure on what guidelines are used by the mod's these days, but in some areas such as this i do think there should be some revisions. It would be interested to see the guidelines publicly published to so the community can provide some feedback

- posted in wrong thread first time around-

Same reply as above - this has been referred to nvr too see if it is acceptable or not then we will have a benchmark of some sort.
It will be known in history as 'The Cockerel Case'

[nvrspk4]

Two things:

1) Posting the link after you have been explicitly told not to post it on the forum is simply asking for trouble, its hard for me to understand your point about being targeted or treated like a child. Even a child knows that when they're told not to do something once, not to do it again or else they will be punished.

2) Making the argument that "what's wrong with posting about a rooster and a box :eusa_ange" is simple mockery. You argue for common sense in moderation and I believe in using common sense over strict interpretation, but use common sense here. Your argument is not that it was really clean, obviously it is a little dirty. The argument you should be making is that innuendo such as this should be allowed, not that it was ok because it was simply referring to a rooster and a box.

I'm talking to forum management about the issue and we'll let you know when we figure out what we want to do about this going forward.

[Mentor]

Reading the reply i would like to backup my claims on kids programs including worse innuendo's. I'm gonna do so in spoiler just to be on the safe side, despite em being on a number of kids tv programs - the innuendo is pretty obvious in all.

Show Hide

Playing with each others twangers - rainbow, playing with lala(i think's) hole - teletubbies and "fingering Prince" from animanics

So i'm pro allowing light inundo on the main forum, and with a link warning, the more obvious/dirty stuff :p
Although teletubbys i think may have outdone the rooster in a box one anyway :p

[Lost]

You're a cautioned member so I wouldn't be surprised if it was removed because you were acting like a ***, or arguments were involved.

[The Professor]

Reading the reply i would like to backup my claims on kids programs including worse innuendo's. I'm gonna do so in spoiler just to be on the safe side, despite em being on a number of kids tv programs - the innuendo is pretty obvious in all.

Show Hide

Playing with each others twangers - rainbow, playing with lala(i think's) hole - teletubbies and "fingering Prince" from animanics

So i'm pro allowing light inundo on the main forum, and with a link warning, the more obvious/dirty stuff :p
Although teletubbys i think may have outdone the rooster in a box one anyway :p

Imo you missed the most glaring one: Tinky Winky

I think this thread has been given far too much time. Hx should implement a "do not take the piss" rule.

[GommeInc]

It's not the joke ebay one is it? Where a man is selling a cockerel in a box? That shouldn't of been removed, simply because it broke no forum rules.

[le harry]

EVERYONE REVOLT HABBOXFORUM IS CORRUPT SACK NVRSPK AND FAT GO TO OPINIONSFTW THEY WONT DELETE UR THREADS