Super Size Zero: Healthy Image?

[Mentor]

of course it's not a healthy imagine, it looks very UNHEALTHY being that skinny. I mean fair enough people can eat and eat and eat and still not gain any weight (like my sister) but there is no excuse for size zero's aprart from Vanity or Mental Illness.

Plenty of people are size zero and eat perfectly normal amounts and are a perfectly normal size. A tiny diameter on a 20 foot tree may not be normal, but a tiny on on a tree thats barely a foot defiantly isn't. Same applies to people. big people are bigger, small people are smaller. Its all about being proportionate and at the end of the day healthy o.0 Equally the sizes arn't always as small as they sound, most size 0 stuff is supposed to fit tightly, the same build would probably fit the size's up one or two lots just as well, with a less tight fit.

Size 0 is UK size 6 btw.

Show Hide

Size conversion made based on original research from wikipedia talk pages - site content appears to be incorrect. If anything size 0 is slightly bigger than a uk size 6.
Basis for claim:
Hollister size 0: 31.5-24-34 Abercrombie size 0: 31.5-24.5-34.5
Miss Selfridge Size 6: 31-24-33 TopShop Size 6: 31-24.5-33

[AlexOC]

TBH i wouldn't a size 0 GF in public, but i think we all agree in the bedroom we would prefer skinny than fat.

Unless you like buckets.

[NIKKEE]

Size 0 is a UK size 4, you add 4 sizes up from American sizes.
A size 6 in American is a size 10 here.

[Mentor]

Size 0 is a UK size 4, you add 4 sizes up from American sizes.
A size 6 in American is a size 10 here.

I actually included some proof size 6 is the equivalent of size zero in my above post. Its an incorrect assumption that size zero and size 4 are the same.

Here are measurements of two shops size zero cloths
Hollister size 0: 31.5-24-34
Abercrombie size 0: 31.5-24.5-34.5

Notice now these measurements of size 6 cloths in the uk are actually even smaller?
Miss Selfridge Size 6: 31-24-33
TopShop Size 6: 31-24.5-33

[FlyingJesus]

of course it's not a healthy imagine, it looks very UNHEALTHY being that skinny. I mean fair enough people can eat and eat and eat and still not gain any weight (like my sister) but there is no excuse for size zero's aprart from Vanity or Mental Illness.

What's wrong with vanity?

[NIKKEE]

I actually included some proof size 6 is the equivalent of size zero in my above post. Its an incorrect assumption that size zero and size 4 are the same.

Here are measurements of two shops size zero cloths
Hollister size 0: 31.5-24-34
Abercrombie size 0: 31.5-24.5-34.5

Notice now these measurements of size 6 cloths in the uk are actually even smaller?
Miss Selfridge Size 6: 31-24-33
TopShop Size 6: 31-24.5-33

I dunno, I've never heard anything like that.

Here's some other proof.

http://www.net-a-porter.com/intl/Siz...ize-conversion

[Amberr]

Its not healty at all its revolting, why would people want to be that fin anyway. Its not attractive!

[Niall!]

At least if I wanted to kill a thin person, I could use a gun.
With a fat person, I'd have to use a harpoon.

They're naturally disgusting and if there any fat people reading this, stop lying to yourself. Lose some goddamn weight.

[Browney]

TBH i wouldn't a size 0 GF in public, but i think we all agree in the bedroom we would prefer skinny than fat.

Unless you like buckets.

reverse for me. I'd rather have a larger lady in the bed. It's more of a sexy, womanly shape to me. Obviously not extremely but ask me if I want a size 8 or a size 12 and I know who I'd chose. I've always dated petite girls, mind. Personality > Curves > Bones sticking out.

[Pixet]

Size 0 is a 4. Which isn't as bad as people make it sound.



"900 (people) thought the size 0 (4), model was a size 12." I think the picture on the right is amazing. There is nothing wrong with it at all. Hate me but we can all have opinions.

I don't agree with wannarexics though.