Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    1,168
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Jibbish

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    i like both but modern warfare has edges it for me

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    herne bay
    Posts
    11,625
    Tokens
    1,023

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Favourtism View Post
    Just so you know, WaW is COD4 with different maps and skins and a few lines of codes to stop noobtubes in first 5 seconds etc. The physics, everything else is the same lol Treyarch suck monkey ****.

    MW2 isn't on Wii. Modern Warfare 1 is coming to wii 11th november instead
    This is ridiculous. Why do Treyarch suddenly 'suck monkey ****' because it's the same as MW? MW had a very good engine, so why would Treyarch not use it? If it was completely different to MW everyone would have ******* and moaned, so instead they built upon the original.
    WaW is probably my favourite. I'm not a huge fan of WW2 set games but WaW is completely different to other games in that type. Nazi Zombies is just a very welcome add on.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Scotland/England
    Posts
    189
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    MW by far!
    WAW sucked so bad. Treyarch took a risk of going back to WWII and it was definitely a stupid move. Even Cod3 was better than WAW

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    12,315
    Tokens
    33,716
    Habbo
    dbgtz

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Ye but they didnt improve at all with it really, compared to mw2. Ignoring nazi zombies, online is basically the same with different skins and stuff as said before. The only major in game improvement with the bodies and being able to blow off parts.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,071
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ontario View Post
    Even Cod3 was better than WAW


    Quote Originally Posted by dbgtz
    Ye but they didnt improve at all with it really, compared to mw2. Ignoring nazi zombies, online is basically the same with different skins and stuff as said before. The only major in game improvement with the bodies and being able to blow off parts.
    What needs improving? I actually saw an improvement in the shotgun department online, they're not just different skins. Treyarch took the time to record all the new sound effects, make all the new maps and I'm more than sure they weren't actually handed COD4 and remade it all.

    They worked on COD:WAW before COD4 came out, more than likely COD4 came out just as they finished up the designing process. They then had time to improve the engine, learn its capabilities and if they had just 'reskinned' the COD4 weapons then someone would have notice. A quick look at the CODwiki tells me that every single weapon in WAW was made from scratch.

    I honestly don't see people's gripe with the game, other than it's not as good as COD4. But now I guess nothing is as good as COD4

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    3,060
    Tokens
    1,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apeel View Post
    lmao

    I don't understand why so many people don't like it. I understand liking MW better but some people just absolutely hate this game. I don't think WW2 was a stupid move because a lot of people (like me) actually prefer WW2 games.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,071
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stitch View Post
    I don't think WW2 was a stupid move because a lot of people (like me) actually prefer WW2 games.
    I can see why people prefer COD4, it's more 'in tune' to modern affairs and it's also showing the technology we have today. Plus, let's face it, the guns are a lot cooler and the multiplayer is a bit more fun. Although I'd argue that the cold steel and brass gleams of the WWII guns are much better, you can't beat the sound of the double-barrelled shotgun or a Thomspon rifle.

    I prefer WWII because it's got more grit and edge, for me anyway, and has a sense of epicness about being a lone soldier in one army, fighting for what is right in the worst war of mankind.

    Last edited by Fez; 03-09-2009 at 02:22 PM.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Scotland/England
    Posts
    189
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Before MW came out and the game was just showing trailers. I was on forums checking out what people thought for a "Modern Call of Duty". Some American guy had a thread about how he had so longed to be able to kill some "Terrorists" and finally get his revenge on some "rag heads" then no end of people were writing how they agreed and how killing Nazis had got boring.

    As stupid and racist as it was this guy had a point the Modern Warfare brought a new enemy and was in relation to what was being broadcast in the media with the war in Iraq and Afgahistan.

    Now being British i have always had a satisfaction with sticking it to the Nazis in games and as stupid as it sound i felt like i was doing my part for good old England!
    But playing MW was a lot like what i was seeing on the media and then when your killing some of the same enemies in a game that are being fought by your nations forces i can imagine that people (Patriotic Americans in particular) are going to get the same feeling that i would get when i killed the Nazis in Medal of Honer or early Cod games.

    Now you may not agree but this is my opinion.

    Last edited by Ontario; 03-09-2009 at 04:01 PM.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    12,315
    Tokens
    33,716
    Habbo
    dbgtz

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Im not saying cod:waw is awful I am just saying its pretty much mw with things slightly changed to suit the time. I do like it but I'm just saying what I think it pretty much is.

    Wow both my fish are pooping while I typed this.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,071
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbgtz View Post
    Im not saying cod:waw is awful I am just saying its pretty much mw with things slightly changed to suit the time. I do like it but I'm just saying what I think it pretty much is.

    Wow both my fish are pooping while I typed this.
    Offtopic: Nice to know that your fish excrete...

    It's not 'pretty much mw with things slightly changed', Treyarch began development before COD4. Everything was built from the ground up, even the COD4 engine was bonded with other bits and pieces of code. Once COD4 came out, Treyarch actually removed the English campaign from the game and went into overdrive. With new expectations that they themselves didn't expect, they tried to raise the bar further but in the end, going back to WWII wasn't good enough for COD4 lovers.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •