I didn't really realise cyber-bullying was an actual big issue. My only experiences of it (if any) would be users on the forum who are always known for spamming or just being unconstructive with everything they post and therefore get laughed at and flamed about everything they do on the forum.
However I haven't seen this very often; I can only recall two users (one I don't remember the name of) from quite a few years ago who I could probably label as a "victim" of this. One of them still uses the forum but in a much more constructive manor and seems to fit in very well now.
My perception of face-to-face bullying doesn't really reflect this though. I see it more as someone being hassled in some way, no matter how "minor", on a regular basis - also regardless of how they take it.
I could probably go as far as to say I was bullied in a non-stereotypical kind of way where I'd be the one who people kind of "blamed" all the time. I can't explain it because it was never serious and people were always joking. But I think it came about purely because I didn't care and I'm able to laugh things off. If I was more emotional and took things to heart it probably would have effected me - but then again it wouldn't have happened. So perhaps that's not even bullying after all.
Anyway...
I don't understand how that can be effective for a few reasons. Firstly kids could reporting things left right and centre but as I mentioned above, from what I've seen e-bullying comes about over time by the "victim's" constant spamming etc. and when they get -rep they're just like 'hahaha do you think I care?' etc. So basically anything reported by a user like this would be completely taken out of context with no proof of what the original context was. The other major flaw is that chat logs can just be created?
I agree with that whole post but just keeping the quote short. That piece of the quote is exactly what I'm saying. Also yes, you're not forced to stay on the internet. Well, you don't have to even go off the internet - if you're being bullied on MSN, just block them as Jake says or if it's on any website, you've got thousands of others to use which are essentially the same thing.
The point about them knowing the bully in real life makes sense because why on Earth would you stalk someone all over the internet just to "bully" them? I can imagine if they knew them in real life they'd have some idea of what sites they go on which would make the whole stalking thing a bit easier. Plus, I think being able to see the effects it has on them in real life is part of the bully's results.
Anyway, in those kind of cases, I imagine the main bullying happens in school and it's just when they've gone home they carry on via the internet. In this context I think face-to-face bullying vs cyber-bullying is irrelevant. It's just bullying by whatever means is available at the time and therefore should be treated the same.
Like Ussain Bolt?![]()





.










