Rate the moderation on this forum

[cocaine]

im not sure if its just my lack of awareness but the only moderating i've come across has been from Hecktix and MattGarner tbh. i dont post that often however, but apart from them two i think i'd struggle to name any other moderators.

however, saying that, i'd vote average as i've not seen any posts where edits should be made and i've not seen any edits that are totally unjustified.

[iAdam]

im not sure if its just my lack of awareness but the only moderating i've come across has been from Hecktix and MattGarner tbh. i dont post that often however, but apart from them two i think i'd struggle to name any other moderators.

however, saying that, i'd vote average as i've not seen any posts where edits should be made and i've not seen any edits that are totally unjustified.

Last months reports beg to differ

[leah]

I think it's good, it could be improved on but overall the forum is moderated well and trouble is kept to a minimum.

[PriceTags]

I noticed a moderator replied to one of my threads regarding an Edexcel exam I had earlier this year in a part of the forum they didn't moderate at the time, and they told me I had broken the rule regarding when those exams can be discussed, when I had in fact followed the rule to a minute.

Another moderator had made a number of posts about a month (I think) before being hired as a moderator which targetted another member who doesn't use the forum any more (calling her fat, saying the apocalypse was near if she returned and some other things like that). I did complain about it at the time, and report the posts but I never received a reply.

Apart from little things like that, moderation is good, but sometimes the moderators display a strange interpretation of the rules.

[xxMATTGxx]

i'd say good. all of the SMs do a good job, however i can't really say the same for all of the normal moderators. the majority do a decent job at moderating, but one or two do let the team down at times. such as i don't think i've seen a few mods doing their thang around the forum, like making edits, closing threads etc. sure theres a bit more to moderating than the things above, but i'd say those are the areas that most of members can judge upon.

but yeah, as a collective they do a good job. theres room for improvement, but that occurs everywhere and i think mattgarner is doing a good job making those improvements to make the moderating department a much more better team. sure at times some members deem certain mods quite 'strict' or whatever for making certain decisions, but at the end of the day, if ya don't like it, report it.

I have a good idea on who you are talking about.

I can't say I come accross it enough these days to form an opinion.

You make me smile

I don't think many users (ones who are banned are exempt ) have many more infractions than me, obviously some do. I still think the moderation is alright and I accept that the ones I currently have are fair

I agree with you about Catzsy though, fantastic for the moderation department. I genuinely think she takes it from poor > average. Without her I think I'd be voting poor which is a pretty big compliment me thinks.

It is indeed a big compliment, I'm sure she will appreciate it. She already knows what I think about her, but she's a great credit to the department.

Last months reports beg to differ

Keep the reports out of this.

I noticed a moderator replied to one of my threads regarding an Edexcel exam I had earlier this year in a part of the forum they didn't moderate at the time, and they told me I had broken the rule regarding when those exams can be discussed, when I had in fact followed the rule to a minute.

Another moderator had made a number of posts about a month (I think) before being hired as a moderator which targetted another member who doesn't use the forum any more (calling her fat, saying the apocalypse was near if she returned and some other things like that). I did complain about it at the time, and report the posts but I never received a reply.

Apart from little things like that, moderation is good, but sometimes the moderators display a strange interpretation of the rules.

Interesting.

[PriceTags]

Interesting.

I've PMed you the relevant links.

[AgnesIO]

Woot are you gonna ever vote yourself?

---

And it is actually quite good. The PM's are mucher nicer and more personal now, especially Catzy's - mainly because it always seems to be her that reminds me of the rules They are nice PM's, so yeh the quality of moderating is good.

[-WooTWooTWooT-]

I don't need to vote, I'm sure most people would know what I think

[AgnesIO]

I don't need to vote, I'm sure most people would know what I think

Fair enough

Btw I hate you. Supporting Stoke u noob. You robbed up in the Carling Cup >:{

Lol haha, just joking with you

[Arch]

I say 4 (Good) because there is always room for improvement so you cant rly vote perfect. andddddd yerrr as said before I see alot more SMod edits and stuff then normal Mods but i guess that just depends on the section and stuff/whos online when it happens?