Jon Venables back in Jail

[lazerman]

He was only ten, he didn't know what he was doing.

[Jack.Lfc]

He was only ten, he didn't know what he was doing.

******.

Edited by Catzsy(Forum Moderator): Please do not make pointless posts.

[Suspective]

He was only ten, he didn't know what he was doing.

Of course he did.

[Catzsy]

Of course he did.

I think what he means in that at the age of 10 he is not mature enough perhaps to understand the full consequences of his actions. Having said that most children should at least start knowing the basics of right from wrong and he didn't seem to have any sort of conscience or empathy at all whether by nature or nurture.

[jackass]

He was only ten, he didn't know what he was doing.

Tell me you're joking.

[-:Undertaker:-]

He was only ten, he didn't know what he was doing.

Oh thats alright then.

[Jack.Lfc]

They kill someone, live the high life and get £30,000 between them. its wrong.

Anyone see the news before when they where interviewin people, most said they should release the identitys and they should be man enough to face what they get.(yn)

Also its funny how there given secret identities to protect them. What is protecting the neighbours or the people around them? its a ******* joke

[lazerman]

Fair enough if they got a high life, but what else can they do? They cant work because of protection program.

All everybody wants to do is kill him because he made a mistake when he was 10.

[Jack.Lfc]

They shouldnt be killed they should be tortured.

[ifuseekamy]

It wasn't a mistake, it was premeditated. The main reason they were sentenced to murder rather than manslaughter (which would've been due to their age) is because it was discovered they'd attempted to abduct another boy; a woman had heard them saying they were going to take a child, and in their interviews they admitted they originally planned to take a child out and push them under one of the buses on the main road to make it look like an accident. What they ended up doing was far worse.