Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 65
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    11,690
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Pyroka

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    This topic has actually made my day.

    I dont think any form of incest should be allowed, I mean if its someone who wants to do their cousins then sure live and let live but not blood related cousins hell no. I PERSONALLY wouldnt touch either of my cousins with a ten foot pole but im not gonna judge someone who does it.

    if you **** your sister/mum/dad/uncle/auntie/blood relative then you have something wrong with u and should live in a place like tiverton (only devon folk will get that)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,366
    Tokens
    325

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    no, not at all, because it's a health risk to any born children.

    it's weird too but that isn't really a good reason to bad it.
    goodbye.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    8,725
    Tokens
    3,789
    Habbo
    HotelUser

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Because it changes the relationship and mindsets between the two family members engaged in sexual activity, I think incest should not, and never be allowed.
    I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.

  4. #24
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    29,930
    Tokens
    4,351
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think it should be allowed provided people are of age and able to make that choice for themselves. To me, what goes on in the bedroom is not my business or the business of the state either. It may carry small health risks but the fact is we all mostly share genes as it is and also we do not disallow those with a history of family genetic diseases to have a child so this should not be any different.

    I think you have to look past the 'ee thats wrong' part, many things that go on between people may not be to our taste but it is none of our business either what goes on behind closed doors. The same was said (and can still be said) about homosexuality - you may not like the idea of gay sex but it is none of your business nor that of the state what people do in their bedrooms, this of course can be extended to many weird fetishes that are around.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 12-07-2010 at 01:22 AM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    13,167
    Tokens
    21,712
    Habbo
    JennyJukes

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    It may carry small health risks but the fact is we all mostly share genes as it is and also we do not disallow those with a history of family genetic diseases to have a child so this should not be any different.
    hey our genes are very very similar to apes and mice but i'm not going to go **** one, if a guy was to do that would you still being saying "it is none of your business nor that of the state what people do in their bedrooms"?. why's it wrong?

    it's the same debate, you can call my point invalid but ask yourself why bestiality is wrong. how many people would willingly say it's fine? the only answer you'll hear is "it's disgusting, it's wrong, it's rape". it's the same with the view of incest. you can argue that incest may be consented and should be right if they both agree to it but that's not always the case. most of those sibling and even parent/child couples you hear of have been separated at an early age and once they're back together they feel a stronger bond. in my view, they're just confused and it's not healthy at all.
    sure, it was once seen as okay years ago yes but so was slavery. okay that was the best i could think of damn:@

    and actually no-one has the same genes. guys and girls have at least 80 different ones and the ones they share are different alleles serving different purposes.
    i thought we were meant to be unconsciously attracted to people with different genes to ensure a balance and therefore healthier offspring so it's not "low-risk" health risks at all lol, that incest german couple (the ones who met after years apart - refer to what i said about that), 2 out of 4 of their kids are disabled

    i would love to find a guy who treats me like my eldest brother does - not incest - just the same as a lot of hetrosexual guys look for girls like their mothers but the thought of a sexual relationship with him repulses me.

    i'm just really against it for some reason, maybe it's in my genes i respect that times are changing and there are good arguments for why it's not all that bad but i personally find it revolting. sorry...


    pigged 25/08/2019



  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland.
    Posts
    13,083
    Tokens
    2,964
    Habbo
    Yet

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    No that's ******* disgusting, any form of close relation 2nd cousin etc should be class as incest maybe 3rd cousin is okay but personally I wouldn't.


    No it should not be legalised.
    ofwgktadgaf

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,788
    Tokens
    957

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muct View Post
    In some countries it's completely legal, if you were from one of them countries you would agree on it too...
    And you would marry some-one for money? O.o Wtf Jen.
    I would marry anyone for money tbh.

    Anyway, I think its completely wrong. You will probably ruin the relationship with families, theres no reason as to why its wrong, its just simply vile.


  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    193
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I probs wouldn't be too against the relation highlighted in bold, I don't have one, so i'm not sure what they are called.

    Me > My Mum > Her Brother > His Wife > Her Daughter from a previous marriage

    Because they arn't related to me, in ANY way.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Send me a PM if you need any help!


  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,413
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .iNova. View Post
    I probs wouldn't be too against the relation highlighted in bold, I don't have one, so i'm not sure what they are called.

    Me > My Mum > Her Brother > His Wife > Her Daughter from a previous marriage

    Because they arn't related to me, in ANY way.
    thats not incest...

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,896
    Tokens
    2,337

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    close relatives absolute no, auntie/uncle 90/10 wrong, cousins.. 80/20 wrong large distance relatives, 60/40 no
    Last edited by Special; 12-07-2010 at 04:29 PM.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •