Daniel Radcliffe

[Judas]

I think that's generally known as clumsiness...

And has nowt to do with his performing ability.

no its called dyspraxia actually. and it means messages from the brain have problems getting to the body.

[kuzkasate]

I think that's generally known as clumsiness...

And has nowt to do with his performing ability.

no its called dyspraxia actually. and it means messages from the brain have problems getting to the body.

thats it there.

[Misawa]

Oh, dyspraxia. I have a friend of who suffers from it, didn't know Radcliffe did. He obviously has it extremely mildly as I know exactly what it's like. "Clumsiness" was a bad description.

[MJJ]

I think the main thing is really the emotion, as has been highlighted by a few people in this thread. The Harry I know from the books is really passionate and Radcliffe seems to be void of that in his acting. I mean, in my opinion, in the current trailer when he rushes at Ron for the "You have no parents" comment, even that seems to lack any feeling of real enthusiasm. Just seems awkward.

I agree that in the previous films he really didn't show much emotion. One scene that comes to mind is in the third film when he's "crying" and says "He was their friend!" (when talking about Sirius). I thought that scene was awful.
But I thought the part in the trailer where Harry charges towards Ron actually looked really good. I think Dan has gotten better over the years, but I also think that Rupert and Emma are better. I can't wait to see Dan in the graveyard scene in the upcoming film though, I really hope he pulls it off because that was one of my favourite parts of the book and I won't be happy if they ruin it in the movie.