Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    UK, Reading, Berkshire
    Posts
    2,907
    Tokens
    1,471

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well I read they decided to not release it in 3D because they felt they were unable to complete the transition to the standard they would have liked. Personally I'm glad they've decided to release it in 2D for the following reasons.

    1. They could have decided to delay the film for 6 months whilst the finished the transition into 3D
    2. They could have released it in 3D as it is now meaning a lot of people would have paid to see it in 3D and would have come out dispointed.
    3. I've been to see films there were intended to be 3D (such as Christmas Carol, Avatar etc) and they were fantastic because they were created with 3D in mind.
    4. I then go and see films like Toy Story 3 which I wish I just saw in 2D because the actual film was great but I couldn't help but feel dispointed as it was barely 3D and I felt it had 'ZOMGZ 3D' slapped on the front of it just because 3D is the 'in' thing at the moment.
    I’ll be a story in your head, but that’s okay, because we’re all stories in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? Because it was, you know. It was the best. A daft old man who stole a magic box and ran away. Did I ever tell you that I stole it? Well, I borrowed it. I always meant to take it back. Oh, that box, Amy, you’ll dream about that box. It’ll never leave you. Big and little at the same time. Brand-new and ancient and the bluest blue ever. And the times we had, eh? Would had…Never had. In your dreams, they’ll still be there. The Doctor and Amy Pond and the days that never came.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    12,315
    Tokens
    33,716
    Habbo
    dbgtz

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misawa View Post
    There's a stark difference between picture quality and an entire visual dimension.
    No, you're saying because it lowers picture quality there is no point in it. You do realise they have to start from somewhere and in 10 years or so it'll be of equal quality to the HDTVs they have then (quadhd might go mainstream for all that is known) so yeah. Nothing starts great and you shouldnt bash it because it's not amazing, yet.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    bed.
    Posts
    645
    Tokens
    80
    Habbo
    Flowbots

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I read about this last night on muggle.com:eusa_danc
    I don't really mind because I was planning to watch it in 2D anyways, when I'm watching something in 3D i can't help but mess with the glasses.


  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    725
    Tokens
    2,589
    Habbo
    -Paul.

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Techno View Post
    I'm glad they changed it. If all 7(8) eventually do come out in 3D then I will probably see them anyway ;p



    Did that really happen??

    EDIT: Actually I read that Harry Potter was fast approaching the title of highest grossing... film series or whatever. Star Wars is currently at number one which is supposedly why they're planning on rereleasing their films in 3D. WB probably just did this so they can try out gross them after haha.

    There are many reasons for the stop of 3D - they said the 3D wasnt ready but there was a lot of unhappy fans screaming on forums which played a big part
    DJ Porky

    2006-2015
    Habtips - Habbolot - Habbox - Habbed - HHGS

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    19,678
    Tokens
    11,479

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    ...and the world rejoiced.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    1,808
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I hate 3d movies, those glasses are awful!
    and you pay more, so 2ds just better.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    15,171
    Tokens
    1,267

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Selena Gomez View Post
    No, you're saying because it lowers picture quality there is no point in it. You do realise they have to start from somewhere and in 10 years or so it'll be of equal quality to the HDTVs they have then (quadhd might go mainstream for all that is known) so yeah. Nothing starts great and you shouldnt bash it because it's not amazing, yet.
    actually you should, thats how something becomes amazing


  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grippz View Post
    I was over the moon when I read their statement last night. I am so glad they won't be ruining the film by putting it into '3D'

    I don't see how it will be "ruined", as you'll still get the choice between 3D and non 3D...
    Sounds like someone wants to get.... funky.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •