Content Management

[immense]

yeah then they got put back

scammers

[Grig]

Oh, but that was my downfall Griggy, too involved, apparently!!

Personally I think it's a waste of time, no offence to Joe or Calvin, but I think the role of Content AGM was pretty pointless so now it's well... even more pointless. Perhaps Calvin will do a better job and we will actually see the Content Department doing something that is actually worth noting, rather than occasionally editing an article (often leaving behind SPAG mistakes and so forth anyway). Sounds harsh but it's true, I still think the role is obsolete and it would make sense to have a Site Manager and have relevant people maintain different parts of the site. Gonna copy and paste from my other thread:

Out of interest why the hell has the Content AGM been given responsibility for HabboxLive.com? Although it is inevitably going to be merged with Habbox.com itself and thus is part of the Site - it is predominantly community based and requires an AGM who is able to competently oversee it through past experience and knowledge. Something I personally think Alkaz lacks, he's never been involved in HabboxLive. If it is in regard to the content side of things on HabboxLive.com why isn't the Manager doing this as usual? If the Manager isn't doing it then there is an obvious issue.

Furthermore giving the Content AGM 'responsibility' for, what is it, notices and the FAQ? is the most absurd thing I have heard of - ever. Notices can be made by anyone with administrative powers when they are needed. Generally the Community AGM to announce Community events or the Forum Manager to indicate big changes to the forum / forum events. What the Content AGM has to do with anything is beyond me. It gets even more ridiculous when you consider the Content AGM has been given responsibility over the FAQ, the FAQ is all to do with the forum and its moderation. This should therefore be maintained by the Forum Manager (who, along with Oli, spent time coding and making it look nice).

Jin seems to be making some crazy arse decisions recently. Sure it will all work out lovely jubbly though, I'd just personally do it differently - and I know several other members of staff, across the 'ranks', would too. Someone has to be their voice right.

That's the thing, all Alkaz would do is go around our forums, act like he knows the news, post some thing and leave. He isn't a bad guy, but he doesn't has as much knowledge on departments managed. It was a problem with past AGMs too, that's why they rarely dived into the news area. You [Garion] actually knew news and could help us really efficiently and it wouldn't have been as good without a couple of your ideas. If I were owner I would get Oli to involve with news as he knows some stuff there (out of the current AGMs, back then it would have been Garion).

HabboxLive was always controlled by the radio manager, site wise. Hell, Adzeh used to make them himself, and it was good then because he knew the kind of content and exactly what would be listener friendly, with the kind of stuff needed on there.

I would re-vamp the content part of the site, as it seems to me like some do more, and others stay in for a fancy title of sorts. If content AGM is an advisor, I want this joke to end because seriously the advise is simply a hindrance. The managers are perfectably capable of making fully rational decisions.

[Nixt]

Could someone from General Management please explain and justify the extension of the Content AGM's duties? I'm curious to know...