Banned for reporting.

[TonyBest]

Unlucky on the ban, I would appeal the ban and say exactly what has happened and that you didn't advertise any scam sites. Then hopefully they will recheck the chat logs and eventually unban you

[RockyHorror]

Have you noticed that change in moderation quality, they outsourced to china or w/e.

What it looks like is that the moderator types out the wrong name into the ban box because they were being sloppy and rushing it because they have like two moderators per hotel now or something like that.

I think your a bit disillusioned or bitter by what you've read or have happened to you. I know for a fact, there are 10 UK staff, granted a lot of people were cut because of the merge but that was enviable, you have numerous hotels merging into one, therefore an excess amount of staff.

Sulake made the business decision to keep a higher majority of Singaporean staff because it's cheaper for them, but staff from other countries remain and moderation conjunctively.

[AgnesIO]

I think your a bit disillusioned or bitter by what you've read or have happened to you. I know for a fact, there are 10 UK staff, granted a lot of people were cut because of the merge but that was enviable, you have numerous hotels merging into one, therefore an excess amount of staff.

Sulake made the business decision to keep a higher majority of Singaporean staff because it's cheaper for them, but staff from other countries remain and moderation conjunctively.

Please don't use words you don't understand. I believe you meant to say 'inevitable'.

The moderation quality has NEVER been very good - I mean it cannot be the most thrilling job in the world, and the pay is not very good.

[RockyHorror]

Please don't use words you don't understand. I believe you meant to say 'inevitable'.

The moderation quality has NEVER been very good - I mean it cannot be the most thrilling job in the world, and the pay is not very good.

I don't understand the word? But you knew what I meant? Try thinking on that a second. Spelling was never my strong suit, so I let spell check do the work for me, quite clearly i clicked the wrong word. I shall never live down the embarrassment this has caused me and my family.

In every line of job be it high earning or low, there are going to be mistakes. You can't condemn the whole staff by a few mistakes when they deal with hundreds of CFH's daily whereby they make the correct judgement.

[AgnesIO]

I don't understand the word? But you knew what I meant? Try thinking on that a second. Spelling was never my strong suit, so I let spell check do the work for me, quite clearly i clicked the wrong word. I shall never live down the embarrassment this has caused me and my family.

In every line of job be it high earning or low, there are going to be mistakes. You can't condemn the whole staff by a few mistakes when they deal with hundreds of CFH's daily whereby they make the correct judgement.

I didn't say they can't make mistakes, I just think the moderation quality has never been very good.

And don't worry, being a genius I could work out that you didn't mean to talk about envy..

[RockyHorror]

You've conceded to every point I've made, the only reason you're bothering to reply is out of some sense of foolish pride, it's laughable.

The funny thing is I loosely agree with you, just not how you've portrayed it. Some members of the moderation team are more lenient on certain matters, whereby they shouldn't be. All cases should be treated the same, but thats the problem with human moderation, its flawed by the simple fact that people have different POV's.

[AgnesIO]

You've conceded to every point I've made, the only reason you're bothering to reply is out of some sense of foolish pride, it's laughable.

The funny thing is I loosely agree with you, just not how you've portrayed it. Some members of the moderation team are more lenient on certain matters, whereby they shouldn't be. All cases should be treated the same, but thats the problem with human moderation, its flawed by the simple fact that people have different POV's.

You are a fool.

I have not 'conceded to every point you've made' - all I said was the moderation team has never been great?

And with the amount of automated replies for things such as people posting scam sites, I don't think wrong at all.

[RockyHorror]

There mere fact you have made no credible argument towards the points I've written shows you have conceded to them, all you are doing is trying to insult my intelligence or bringing up separate points like in your last post about automated replies, that has nothing to do with either proving or disproving the fact that moderators are competent.

But i'll bite, on the matter of automated replies, of course they have to implement a set of automated replies as it is entirely unfeasible to expect them to give individual responses to the same type of problem. Sulake are running a business not a game as we the user's perceive it, so they don't want to be paying staff to spend copious amount's of time giving individual responses when they could be dealing with other problems. It doesn't mean they don't investigate the CFH it just there to assure user's that there call is being dealt with appropriately, so the user doesn't get despondent by the seemingly lack of action taking place.

[AgnesIO]

There mere fact you have made no credible argument towards the points I've written shows you have conceded to them, all you are doing is trying to insult my intelligence or bringing up separate points like in your last post about automated replies, that has nothing to do with either proving or disproving the fact that moderators are competent.

But i'll bite, on the matter of automated replies, of course they have to implement a set of automated replies as it is entirely unfeasible to expect them to give individual responses to the same type of problem. Sulake are running a business not a game as we the user's perceive it, so they don't want to be paying staff to spend copious amount's of time giving individual responses when they could be dealing with other problems. It doesn't mean they don't investigate the CFH it just there to assure user's that there call is being dealt with appropriately, so the user doesn't get despondent by the seemingly lack of action taking place.

As soon as they tell you to 'press the shut up button' you know full bloody well they are just ignoring the fact another user is breaking the rules.

P.S. Please stop writing essays, you are boring me.

[RockyHorror]

You're no fun, trying to keep a debate up at both ends is tiresome.

And that's all he wrote xox

On-topic;

If your parent's are aware of your Habbo activities, get them to send an email, as for a reason I can't quite fathom Habbo seem to respond quicker to them. :rolleyes: