So apparently referring to someone as a cartoon character is rude...

[Kyle]

jordan you are so rude and snappy lately

[Richie]

jordan you are so rude and snappy lately

man period from the bum


nice pics guys


edit:
wrong thread lalala I DISAGREE WITH YOU ALL SHE DESERVED TO GET IT REMOVED!

[Samantha]

Sorry since when do you tell me or Martin to do something? How do you know something has been done? And if nothing has then there wasn't a problem in the first place.

I haven't looked at it the post that's causing a problem but I will soon when I've finished doing what I need to do.

When people have multiple accounts one tends to get banned, that's the way it works.

[dbgtz]

Well, when a super moderator/administrator speaks to you on MSN telling you to deal with a post because it's been reported you do it. It's how it goes. If you have a problem with something that's been edited there's a support forum and if I get asked to remove it I'll gladly do it.

This post insults my intelligence, I demand it to be removed.

Seriously though, it shouldn't have been removed if there is no reason for it to have been insulting and unless someone can say how it was insulting the removal should be revoked.

Here lads be realistic, if someone quoted my picture and posted a picture of this. I'd be offended. She clearly doesn't like mona the vampire

Yeah but saying that she looked like Mona wasn't really an insult at all. Tell me how it was.

[Jordan]

When people have multiple accounts one tends to get banned, that's the way it works.

Correct. But if that previous account is banned then they are entitled to create another if they are not on the Autoban list.

[Samantha]

Correct. But if that previous account is banned then they are entitled to create another if they are not on the Autoban list.

They weren't banned and still aren't banned on either account so it's still breaking the rules.

[Tom]

This post insults my intelligence, I demand it to be removed.

Seriously though, it shouldn't have been removed if there is no reason for it to have been insulting and unless someone can say how it was insulting the removal should be revoked.

Not going to lie, sometimes I feel like what I'm reading isn't offensive, but if the user reports it then we have to remove it as it's the actual user getting offended. Now, I can't really say that Cerys was the one whom reported it, because I don't know, but as soon as I can get in contact with someone who does know I'll double check.

[dbgtz]

Correct. But if that previous account is banned then they are entitled to create another if they are not on the Autoban list.

This post is off topic therefore you should be permanently banned.

Not going to lie, sometimes I feel like what I'm reading isn't offensive, but if the user reports it then we have to remove it as it's the actual user getting offended. Now, I can't really say that Cerys was the one whom reported it, because I don't know, but as soon as I can get in contact with someone who does know I'll double check.

Alright.

It wasn't her who reported it (if she was telling the truth) therefore surely the report is invalid.

[Jordan]

They weren't banned and still aren't banned on either account so it's still breaking the rules.

Oh you are on about him. I have to wait for a reply, not just an instant ban. It's the way it works.

[Samantha]

Oh you are on about him. I have to wait for a reply, not just an instant ban. It's the way it works.

That explains why spam bots get banned straight away and others don't. Thanks.